On "Sourcery," or Code as Fetish

This essay offers a sympathetic interrogation of the move within new media studies toward "software studies." Arguing against theoretical conceptions of programming languages as the ultimate performative utterance, it contends that source code is never simply the source of any action; rather, source code is only source code after the fact: its effectiveness depends on a whole imagined network of machines and humans. This does not mean that source code does nothing, but rather that it serves as a kind of fetish, and that the notion of the user as super agent, buttressed by real-time computation, is the obverse, not the opposite of this "sourcery."

[1]  S. Freud,et al.  Sexuality and the psychology of love , 1963 .

[2]  Postmodernism and Hong Kong Cinema , 2000 .

[3]  James Clifford,et al.  On Ethnographic Authority , 1983 .

[4]  Edward W. Said,et al.  Representing the Colonized: Anthropology's Interlocutors , 1989, Critical Inquiry.

[5]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  Surveillance and Capture: Two Models of Privacy , 1994, Inf. Soc..

[6]  Nicholas Mirzoeff,et al.  The visual culture reader , 2002 .

[7]  T. Todorov.  Knowledge in Social Anthropology: Distancing and Universality , 1988 .

[8]  Allen J. Chun.  An oriental orientalism: The paradox of tradition and modernity in nationalist Taiwan , 1995 .

[9]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[10]  Gian-Carlo Rota,et al.  History of Computing in the Twentieth Century , 1980 .

[11]  P. Agre.  Computation and human experience , 1997 .

[12]  I. Wallerstein.  Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms , 1991 .

[13]  Arjun Appadurai,et al.  Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy , 1990 .

[14]  T. Nairn.  Faces of Nationalism: Janus Revisited , 1997 .

[15]  Allen J. Chun,et al.  Fuck Chineseness: On the Ambiguities of Ethnicity as Culture as Identity , 1996 .

[16]  L. Manovich,et al.  The language of new media , 2001 .

[17]  A. Dirlik.  The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism , 1994, Critical Inquiry.

[18]  J. Friedman.  Being in the World: Globalization and Localization , 1990 .

[19]  S. Žižek.  The sublime object of ideology , 1989 .

[20]  Wendy Hui Kyong Chun,et al.  The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory , 2008, Critical Inquiry.

[21]  N. Katherine Hayles.  My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts , 2005 .

[22]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[23]  "You Asians:" On the Historical Role of the West and Asia Binary , 2000 .

[24]  K. Marx.  Capital: A Critique of Political Economy , 1867 .

[25]  E. Apter,et al.  Fetishism As Cultural Discourse , 1993 .

[26]  Peter Weibel,et al.  CTRL [space] : rhetorics of surveillance from bentham to big brother , 2002 .

[27]  Manfred Broy,et al.  Software Pioneers: Contributions to Software Engineering , 2002 .

[28]  W. McCulloch,et al.  Embodiments of Mind , 1966 .

[29]  William Pietz,et al.  The Problem of the Fetish, I , 1985, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[30]  J. Butler.  Excitable Speech. A Politics of the Performative , 1997 .

[31]  N. Macrae.  John Von Neumann , 1992 .

[32]  D. Lindenfeld,et al.  What is Enlightenment? : eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions , 1998 .

[33]  Wendy Hui Kyong Chun,et al.  On Software, or the Persistence of Visual Knowledge , 2005, Grey Room.

[34]  Allen J. Chun.  From Text to Context: How Anthropology Makes Its Subject , 2000 .

[35]  Anne Mcclintock.  The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term "Post-Colonialism" , 1992 .