Spatial pavement roughness from stationary laser scanning

Abstract Pavement roughness is a key parameter for controlling pavement construction processes and for assessing ride quality during the life of a pavement system. This paper describes algorithms used in processing three-dimensional (3D) stationary terrestrial laser scanning (STLS) point clouds to obtain surface maps of point wise indices that characterise pavement roughness. The backbone of the analysis is a quarter-car model simulation over a spatial 3D mesh grid representing the pavement surface. With the rich data-set obtained by 3D scanning, the algorithms identify several dynamic responses and inferences (suspension, acceleration and jerk) at each point in the domain. Variability in the indices is compared for a ‘rough’ pavement and a ‘smooth’ pavement in the spatial domain for different speed simulations of the quarter-car model. Results show high spatial variability in the various roughness indices both longitudinally and transversely (i.e. different wheel path positions). It is proposed that pavement roughness characterisation using a spatial framework coupled with univariate statistics provides more details on the severity and location of pavement roughness features compared to the (1D) one-dimensional methods. This paper describes approaches that provide an algorithmic framework for others collecting similar STLS 3D spatial data to be used in advanced pavement roughness characterisation.

[1]  Nii O. Attoh-Okine Grouping Pavement Condition Variables for Performance Modeling Using Self-Organizing Maps , 2001 .

[2]  Jianping Wu,et al.  Horizontal Roadway Curvature Computation Algorithm Using Vision Technology , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[3]  Emmanuel G Fernando,et al.  Impact of Changes in Profile Measurement Technology on QA Testing of Pavement Smoothness: Technical Report , 2013 .

[4]  David W. Albrecht,et al.  Recognizing Patterns in Seasonal Variation of Pavement Roughness Using Minimum Message Length Inference , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[5]  Igor Rychlik,et al.  Vehicle fatigue damage caused by road irregularities , 2009 .

[6]  K. Chang,et al.  Application of 3D Laser Scanning on Measuring Pavement Roughness , 2006 .

[7]  Chiu Liu,et al.  ROAD PROFILES, VEHICLE DYNAMICS, AND HUMAN JUDGMENT OF SERVICEABILITY OF ROADS: SPECTRAL FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[8]  F Oijer,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF TRANSIENT ROAD OBSTACLE DISTRIBUTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON VEHICLE DURABILITY AND DRIVER COMFORT , 2004 .

[9]  Hui Gao,et al.  A Markov‐Based Road Maintenance Optimization Model Considering User Costs , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Christina Plati,et al.  An alternative approach to pavement roughness evaluation , 2008 .

[11]  M. Wand Data-Based Choice of Histogram Bin Width , 1997 .

[12]  Praprut Songchitruksa,et al.  A Decision Support System for Flexible Pavement Treatment Selection , 2003 .

[13]  Wenbin Ouyang,et al.  Pavement cracking measurements using 3D laser-scan images , 2013 .

[14]  Ronald S. Harichandran,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Highway Pavement Roughness , 1991 .

[15]  C. Kuo,et al.  Effects of Pavement Roughness on Rigid Pavement Stress , 2011 .

[16]  Eduardo Zalama Casanova,et al.  An Effective Texture Mapping Approach for 3D Models Obtained from Laser Scanner Data to Building Documentation , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[17]  Y. Ouyang,et al.  Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: exact and approximate solutions , 2004 .

[18]  Joseph L. Schofer,et al.  Trend curve optimal control model for highway pavement maintenance: Case study and evaluation , 1994 .

[19]  Elias M. Stein,et al.  Fourier Analysis: An Introduction , 2003 .

[20]  Michael W. Sayers,et al.  INTERPRETATION OF ROAD ROUGHNESS PROFILE DATA , 1996 .

[21]  Kjella Ahlin,et al.  Relating Road Roughness and Vehicle Speeds to Human Whole Body Vibration and Exposure Limits , 2002 .

[22]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Calibration of response-type road roughness measuring systems , 1980 .

[23]  T D Gillespie,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING AND CALIBRATING ROAD ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENTS , 1986 .

[24]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[25]  Lu Sun,et al.  Simulation of pavement roughness and IRI based on power spectral density , 2003, Math. Comput. Simul..

[26]  Michael W Gillespie Thomas D Queiroz Cesar A.V Sayers,et al.  The International Road Roughness Experiment (IRRE) : establishing correlation and a calibration standard for measurements , 1986 .

[27]  Chiu Liu,et al.  Road Profile, Vehicle Dynamics, and Ride Quality Rating , 1999 .

[28]  John T Harvey,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of automated pavement condition survey service providers' technical competence , 2013 .

[29]  Roger S Walker,et al.  Comparative Testing of Lasers for Ride Quality Measurement on Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements , 2014 .

[30]  Joseph Giacomin,et al.  On the need for bump event correction in vibration test profiles representing road excitations in automobiles , 2002 .

[31]  Ashraf Rahim,et al.  Evaluation of international roughness index for asphalt overlays placed over cracked and seated concrete pavements , 2009 .