PCEP Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP Automatic Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful PCE

The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. The Stateful PCE extensions allow stateful control of Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) using PCEP. The automatic bandwidth feature allows automatic and dynamic adjustment of the TE LSP bandwidth reservation based on the volume of traffic flowing through the LSP. This document describes PCEP extensions for automatic bandwidth adjustment when employing an Active Stateful PCE for both PCE-Initiated and PCC-Initiated LSPs. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 . Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current InternetDrafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/ . Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." Dhody, et al. Expires December 23, 2019 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Auto-Bandwidth with Stateful PCE June 21, 2019

[1]  Daniel King,et al.  Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Management Information Base (MIB) Module , 2014, RFC.

[2]  Luyuan Fang,et al.  The Use Cases for Using PCE as the Central Controller(PCECC) of LSPs , 2016 .

[3]  Clarence Filsfils,et al.  IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing , 2019, RFC.

[4]  Scott O. Bradner,et al.  Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels , 1997, RFC.

[5]  Jürgen Schönwälder,et al.  Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) , 2011, RFC.

[6]  Adrian Farrel,et al.  A Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture , 2006, RFC.

[7]  Andy Bierman Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model Documents , 2011, RFC.

[8]  Dimitri Papadimitriou,et al.  Analysis of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)-based Recovery Mechanisms (including Protection and Restoration) , 2006, RFC.

[9]  Zhenbin Li,et al.  A Framework of MPLS Global Label , 2014 .

[10]  Loa Andersson,et al.  Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Stack Entry: "EXP" Field Renamed to "Traffic Class" Field , 2009, RFC.

[11]  Ina Minei,et al.  PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE , 2012 .

[12]  D. McInerney Motivation , 2019, Educational Psychology.

[13]  Ina Minei,et al.  Conveying path setup type in PCEP messages , 2014 .

[14]  Margaret Wasserman,et al.  Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH) , 2011, RFC.

[15]  Acee Lindem,et al.  A YANG Data Model for Routing Management , 2016, RFC.

[16]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels , 2001, RFC.

[17]  Ina Minei,et al.  Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model , 2017, RFC.

[18]  Jean-Louis Le Roux,et al.  Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) , 2009, RFC.

[19]  Zareen Syed Introduction and Motivation , 2019, Trustworthy Online Controlled Experiments.

[20]  Clarence Filsfils,et al.  PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing , 2019 .

[21]  Andy Bierman,et al.  Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model , 2012, RFC.