Estimation of parameters in DNA mixture analysis

In [7], a Bayesian network for analysis of mixed traces of DNA was presented using gamma distributions for modelling peak sizes in the electropherogram. It was demonstrated that the analysis was sensitive to the choice of a variance factor and hence this should be adapted to any new trace analysed. In this paper, we discuss how the variance parameter can be estimated by maximum likelihood to achieve this. The unknown proportions of DNA from each contributor can similarly be estimated by maximum likelihood jointly with the variance parameter. Furthermore, we discuss how to incorporate prior knowledge about the parameters in a Bayesian analysis. The proposed estimation methods are illustrated through a few examples of applications for calculating evidential value in casework and for mixture deconvolution.

[1]  P. Bassigny,et al.  [The methods of practice]. , 1965, Ujcd. Union Des Jeunes Chirurgiens-Dentistes.

[2]  J A Lambert,et al.  Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[4]  M W Perlin,et al.  Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Peter M Vallone,et al.  Allele frequencies for 15 autosomal STR loci on U.S. Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic populations. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  P. Gill,et al.  PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[7]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[8]  Tsewei Wang,et al.  Least‐Square Deconvolution: A Framework for Interpreting Short Tandem Repeat Mixtures * , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  S L Lauritzen,et al.  Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[10]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  A gamma model for {DNA} mixture analyses , 2007 .

[11]  J. Curran.  A MCMC method for resolving two person mixtures. , 2008, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[12]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  Robert G Cowell,et al.  Validation of an STR peak area model. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  J. Mortera,et al.  Sensitivity of inferences in forensic genetics to assumptions about founding genes , 2009, 0908.2862.

[15]  By W. R. GILKSt,et al.  Adaptive Rejection Sampling for Gibbs Sampling , 2010 .

[16]  S L Lauritzen,et al.  Probabilistic expert systems for handling artifacts in complex DNA mixtures. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[17]  M. Perlin,et al.  Validating TrueAllele® DNA Mixture Interpretation * ,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[19]  D. Balding,et al.  Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[20]  J. Mortera,et al.  Analysis of forensic DNA mixtures with artefacts , 2013, 1302.4404.

[21]  Therese Graversen,et al.  Analysis of DNA Mixtures with Artifacts , 2013 .