Antler Size Provides an Honest Signal of Male Phenotypic Quality in Roe Deer

Identifying factors shaping secondary sexual traits is essential in understanding how their variation may influence male fitness. Little information is available on the allocation of resources to antler growth in territorial ungulates with low sexual size dimorphism. We investigated phenotypic and environmental factors affecting both absolute and relative antler size of male roe deer in three contrasting populations in France and Sweden. In the three populations, we found marked age‐specific variation in antler size, with an increase in both absolute and relative antler size between yearling and prime‐age stages, followed by a decrease (senescence) for males older than 7 years. Antler size increased allometrically with body mass. This increase was particularly strong for senescent males, suggesting the evolution of two reproductive tactics: heavy old males invested particularly heavily in antler growth (potentially remaining competitive for territories), whereas light old males grew small antlers (potentially abandoning territory defense). Finally, environmental conditions had little effect on antler size: only population density negatively affected absolute antler size in one of the three populations. Antler size may therefore provide an honest signal of male phenotypic quality in roe deer. We discuss the implications of these results in terms of territory tenure and mating competition.

[1]  J. Huxley.  46. The Relative Size of Antlers in Deer , 2009 .

[2]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The influence of climatic variation on the birth weights of Red deer (Cervus elaphus) , 2009 .

[3]  C. Melis,et al.  Fighting behaviour in territorial male roe deer Capreolus capreolus: the effects of antler size and residence , 2007, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[4]  J. Gaillard,et al.  How does environmental variation influence body mass, body size, and body condition? Roe deer as a case study , 2006 .

[5]  U. Candolin,et al.  How is female mate choice affected by male competition? , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Climate‐dependent allocation of resources to secondary sexual traits in red deer , 2005 .

[7]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  The response of fawn survival to changes in habitat quality varies according to cohort quality and spatial scale , 2005 .

[8]  R. Weladji,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and intercorhort variation in reindeer calf antler length is associated with density and weather , 2005, Oecologia.

[9]  M. Gomendio,et al.  Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  J. Gaillard,et al.  The effects of a severe drought on mouflon lamb survival , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  R. J. Putman,et al.  Supplementary winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: justifications, feeding practice and effectiveness , 2004 .

[12]  B. Bassano,et al.  Horn growth but not asymmetry heralds the onset of senescence in male Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) , 2004 .

[13]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Assessing senescence patterns in populations of large mammals , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[14]  Kevin Fowler,et al.  Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  D. Coltman,et al.  Relative allocation to horn and body growth in bighorn rams varies with resource availability , 2004 .

[16]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  AGE AND DENSITY MODIFY THE EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY ON SURVIVAL AND MOVEMENTS OF ROE DEER , 2003 .

[17]  R. H. Kushler,et al.  Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-PLUS , 2003, Technometrics.

[18]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Effects of hurricane lothar on the population dynamics of european roe deer , 2003 .

[19]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[20]  D. Coltman,et al.  Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  H. Kokko,et al.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Cohort effects and deer population dynamics , 2003 .

[23]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Age– and density–dependent reproductive effort in male red deer , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Tim Clutton-Brock,et al.  ANTLER SIZE IN RED DEER: HERITABILITY AND SELECTION BUT NO EVOLUTION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  I. Owens,et al.  Evolutionary Ecology of Birds: Life Histories, Mating Systems and Extinction , 2002 .

[27]  D. Coltman,et al.  Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Vincent J. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[29]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Population density and small-scale variation in habitat quality affect phenotypic quality in roe deer , 2001, Oecologia.

[30]  J. P. Ball,et al.  AGE-RELATED REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT AND SENESCENCE IN FREE-RANGING MOOSE, ALCES ALCES , 2001 .

[31]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density–dependent senescence , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  F. Guinness,et al.  Antler length of yearling red deer is determined by population density, weather and early life-history , 2001, Oecologia.

[33]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores , 2000 .

[34]  J. Kotiaho.  Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer , 2000 .

[36]  R. Andersen,et al.  The European roe deer: the biology of success. , 2000 .

[37]  A. Mcdiarmid,et al.  Roe deer: Management and stalking , 2000 .

[38]  Marco Festa-Bianchet,et al.  AGE‐SPECIFIC SURVIVAL IN FIVE POPULATIONS OF UNGULATES: EVIDENCE OF SENESCENCE , 1999 .

[39]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Tests of estimation of age from tooth wear on roe deer of known age: variation within and among populations , 1999 .

[40]  A. K. Prichard,et al.  Factors affecting velvet antler weights in free-ranging reindeer in Alaska , 1999 .

[41]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Antler growth and extinction of Irish elk , 1999 .

[42]  Rauno V. Alatalo,et al.  Good-genes effects in sexual selection , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  C. Pélabon,et al.  Asymmetry in antler size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus ): an index of individual and population conditions , 1998, Oecologia.

[44]  M. Festa‐Bianchet,et al.  Effects of population density on horn development in bighorn rams , 1998 .

[45]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations , 1997, Oecologia.

[46]  Sherwick E. Min.  Variation in Sexually Dimorphic Traits of Male Pronghorns , 1997 .

[47]  L. K. Wahlstrm.  The significance of male-male aggression for yearling dispersal in roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ) , 1994 .

[48]  B. Sæther,et al.  Male Traits as Life-History Variables: Annual Variation in Body Mass and Antler Size in Moose (Alces alces) , 1994 .

[49]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Roe deer survival patterns: a comparative analysis of contrasting populations , 1993 .

[50]  D. Schluter,et al.  Sexual selection when the female directly benefits , 1993 .

[51]  Jean-Michel Gaillard,et al.  Effects of age and body weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) , 1992 .

[52]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .

[53]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[54]  K. Scribner,et al.  Environmental and Genetic Components of Antler Growth in White-Tailed Deer , 1989 .

[55]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  Sexual selection: the handicap principle does work – sometimes , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[56]  B. Sæther,et al.  Geographical Variation in the Antlers of Norwegian Moose in Relation to Age and Size , 1985 .

[57]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Evolution in Age-Structured Populations , 1984 .

[58]  T. Skogland.  The effects of density dependent resource limitation on size of wild reindeer , 1983, Oecologia.

[59]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Climatic Variation and Body Weight of Red Deer , 1983 .

[60]  M. Wade.  Sexual Selection and Variance in Reproductive Success , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[61]  A. Zahavi.  The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[62]  N. Owen‐Smith.  On Territoriality in Ungulates and an Evolutionary Model , 1977, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[63]  V. P. W. Lowe,et al.  The Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) Population at Kalo and the Factors Regulating Its Size. , 1973 .

[64]  G. Caughley.  Mortality Patterns in Mammals , 1966 .

[65]  Yngve Espmark,et al.  Studies in dominance-subordination relationship in a group of semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) , 1964 .

[66]  A. Gray,et al.  I. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1963 .

[67]  F. J. Schmid.  Erfahrungen in der freien Wildbahn mit der Vogt'schen Ernährungshege auf Grund der Schneeberger Versuche , 1955, Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft.

[68]  R A Fisher,et al.  The evolution of sexual preference. , 1915, The Eugenics review.

[69]  A. Rörig.  Das Wachstum des Geweihes von Capreolus vulgaris , 1908, Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen.

[70]  P. Smith,et al.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[71]  C. Darwin.  The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[72]  C. Darwin.  The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1859 .

[73]  Becker,et al.  Short-term variations and long-term changes in oak productivity in northeastern France . The role of climate and atmospheric CO 2 , 2007 .

[74]  L. Bartoš,et al.  Antler size and fluctuating asymmetry in red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags and probability of becoming a harem holder in rut , 2006 .

[75]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations , 2005, Oecologia.

[76]  L. Wahlström,et al.  The significance of male-male aggression for yearling dispersal in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[77]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Ecological Correlates of Life Span in Populations of Large Herbivorous Mammals , 2003 .

[78]  P. Kjellander.  Density dependence in roe deer population dynamics , 2000 .

[79]  Ilan Eshel,et al.  On Fisher-Zahavi's handicapped sexy son , 2000 .

[80]  E. Paul Ashley,et al.  Morphological responses of white-tailed deer to a severe population reduction , 1998 .

[81]  Jean-Michel Gaillard,et al.  Body mass of roe deer fawns during winter in 2 contrasting populations , 1996 .

[82]  A. Johansson,et al.  Territorial dynamics and marking behaviour in male roe deer , 1996 .

[83]  T. Nieminen,et al.  Short-term variations and long-term changes in oak productivity in northeastern France. The role of climate and atmospheric CO2 , 1994 .

[84]  A. Møller.  Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm production in mammals , 1989 .

[85]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Suivi de l'évolution de la fécondité chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) par l'observation des groupes familiaux , 1987 .

[86]  C. Fowler.  A Review of Density Dependence in Populations of Large Mammals , 1987 .

[87]  Richard J. Goss,et al.  Deer Antlers: Regeneration, Function and Evolution , 1983 .

[88]  T. Clutton‐Brock.  The Functions of Antlers , 1982 .

[89]  V. Geist.  The Evolution of Horn-Like Organs , 1966 .

[90]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.