Evaluation of various observing systems for the global monitoring of CO2 surface fluxes

Abstract. In the context of rising greenhouse gas concentrations, and the potential feedbacks between climate and the carbon cycle, there is an urgent need to monitor the exchanges of carbon between the atmosphere and both the ocean and the land surfaces. In the so-called top-down approach, the surface fluxes of CO2 are inverted from the observed spatial and temporal concentration gradients. The concentrations of CO2 are measured in-situ at a number of surface stations unevenly distributed over the Earth while several satellite missions may be used to provide a dense and better-distributed set of observations to complement this network. In this paper, we compare the ability of different CO2 concentration observing systems to constrain surface fluxes. The various systems are based on realistic scenarios of sampling and precision for satellite and in-situ measurements. It is shown that satellite measurements based on the differential absorption technique (such as those of SCIAMACHY, GOSAT or OCO) provide more information than the thermal infrared observations (such as those of AIRS or IASI). The OCO observations will provide significantly better information than those of GOSAT. A CO2 monitoring mission based on an active (lidar) technique could potentially provide an even better constraint. This constraint can also be realized with the very dense surface network that could be built with the same funding as that of the active satellite mission. Despite the large uncertainty reductions on the surface fluxes that may be expected from these various observing systems, these reductions are still insufficient to reach the highly demanding requirements for the monitoring of anthropogenic emissions of CO2 or the oceanic fluxes at a spatial scale smaller than that of oceanic basins. The scientific objective of these observing system should therefore focus on the fluxes linked to vegetation and land ecosystem dynamics.

[1]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  Quantifying the benefit of A-SCOPE data for reducing uncertainties in terrestrial carbon fluxes in CCDAS , 2010 .

[2]  F. Chapin,et al.  Permafrost and the Global Carbon Budget , 2006, Science.

[3]  Shamil Maksyutov,et al.  TransCom 3 CO2 inversion intercomparison: 1. Annual mean control results and sensitivity to transport and prior flux information , 2003 .

[4]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  P. Ciais,et al.  Vulnerability of east Siberia's frozen carbon stores to future warming , 2008 .

[6]  Philippe Bousquet,et al.  Inferring CO2 sources and sinks from satellite observations: Method and application to TOVS data , 2005 .

[7]  Olivier Pannekoucke,et al.  Structure of the transport uncertainty in mesoscale inversions of CO 2 sources and sinks using ensemble model simulations , 2008 .

[8]  Taro Takahashi,et al.  Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO2 , 2009 .

[9]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe - Part 1: mapping the atmospheric CO2 signals , 2006 .

[10]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  Inverse problems in atmospheric constituent transport , 2002 .

[11]  Ilse Aben,et al.  Evidence of systematic errors in SCIAMACHY-observed CO 2 due to aerosols , 2005 .

[12]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[13]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Grid resolution dependence in the reconstruction of an atmospheric tracer source , 2005 .

[14]  S. Maksyutov,et al.  A very high-resolution global fossil fuel CO2 emission inventory derived using a point source database and satellite observations of nighttime lights, 1980–2007 , 2010 .

[15]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes , 1999 .

[16]  C. Rödenbeck Estimating CO2 sources and sinks from atmospheric mixing ratio measurements using a global inversion of atmospheric transport , 2005 .

[17]  David Crisp,et al.  Precision requirements for space-based XCO2 data , 2007 .

[18]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Optimizing a process‐based ecosystem model with eddy‐covariance flux measurements: A pine forest in southern France , 2007 .

[19]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[20]  Didier Bruneau,et al.  Laser diode absorption spectroscopy for accurate CO(2) line parameters at 2 microm: consequences for space-based DIAL measurements and potential biases. , 2009, Applied optics.

[21]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2009 .

[22]  François-Marie Bréon,et al.  Contribution of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory to the estimation of CO2 sources and sinks: Theoretical study in a variational data assimilation framework , 2007 .

[23]  Sander Houweling,et al.  Inverse modeling of CO2 sources and sinks using satellite data: a synthetic inter-comparison of measurement techniques and their performance as a function of space and time , 2003 .

[24]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[25]  Fabienne Maignan,et al.  Interannual vegetation phenology estimates from global AVHRR measurements: Comparison with in situ data and applications , 2008 .

[26]  Justus Notholt,et al.  The importance of transport model uncertainties for the estimation of CO2 sources and sinks using satellite measurements , 2010 .

[27]  S. Doney,et al.  Toward a mechanistic understanding of the decadal trends in the Southern Ocean carbon sink , 2008 .

[28]  S. Bony,et al.  The LMDZ4 general circulation model: climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection , 2006 .

[29]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models , 2002, Nature.

[30]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  On the assignment of prior errors in Bayesian inversions of CO2 surface fluxes , 2006 .

[31]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Saturation of the Southern Ocean CO 2 Sink Due to Recent Climate Change , 2007 .

[32]  William L. Smith,et al.  AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua mission: design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  Jeffrey Y. Beyon,et al.  Coherent differential absorption lidar measurements of CO2. , 2004, Applied optics.

[34]  Wolfgang Knorr,et al.  Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions increasing? , 2009 .

[35]  P. Rayner,et al.  The utility of remotely sensed CO2 concentration data in surface source inversions , 2001 .

[36]  Fabienne Maignan,et al.  Analysis of hot spot directional signatures measured from space , 2002 .

[37]  D. Baldocchi ‘Breathing’ of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems , 2008 .

[38]  J. Randerson,et al.  An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Carbon source/sink information provided by column CO 2 measurements from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory , 2008 .

[40]  Casper Labuschagne,et al.  Saturation of the Southern Ocean CO2 Sink Due to Recent Climate Change , 2007, Science.

[41]  Philippe Peylin,et al.  The contribution of AIRS data to the estimation of CO2 sources and sinks , 2005 .

[42]  Mark A. Stephen,et al.  Laser Sounder for Global Measurement of CO2 Concentrations in the Troposphere from Space , 2008 .

[43]  Masakatsu Nakajima,et al.  Thermal and near infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring. , 2009, Applied optics.

[44]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  On the accuracy of the CO2 surface fluxes to be estimated from the GOSAT observations , 2009 .

[45]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  On aggregation errors in atmospheric transport inversions , 2001 .

[46]  Andrew J. Watson,et al.  A variable and decreasing sink for atmospheric CO2 in the North Atlantic , 2007 .

[47]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[48]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[49]  Philippe Peylin,et al.  A new global gridded data set of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion: Methodology and evaluation , 2010 .

[50]  Josep G. Canadell,et al.  Carbon and the Anthropocene , 2010 .

[51]  R. Vautard,et al.  TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO2: Experimental overview and diurnal cycle results for 2002 , 2008, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[52]  F. Bréon,et al.  Spaceborne observations of ocean glint reflectance and modeling of wave slope distributions , 2006 .

[53]  M. Heimann,et al.  On Observational and Modelling Strategies Targeted at Regional Carbon Exchange Over Continents: The Importance of the Near-Field of CO2 Observations , 2008 .

[54]  David Crisp,et al.  The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission , 2004 .

[55]  P. Ciais,et al.  Inverse modeling of CO 2 sources and sinks using satellite data : a synthetic inter-comparison of measurement techniques and their performance as a function of space and time , 2003 .