Generating Synthetic Mammograms From Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a promising 3-D modality that may replace mammography in the future. However, lesion search is likely to require more time in DBT volumes, while comparisons between views from different projections and prior exams might be harder to make. This may make screening with DBT cumbersome. A solution may be provided by synthesizing 2-D mammograms from DBT, which may then be used to guide the search for abnormalities. In this work we focus on synthesizing mammograms in which masses and architectural distortions are optimally visualized. Our approach first determines relevant points in a DBT volume with a computer-aided detection system and then renders a mammogram from the intersection of a surface fitted through these points and the DBT volume. The method was evaluated in a pilot observer study where three readers reported mass findings in 87 patients (25 malignant, 62 normal) for which both DBT and digital mammograms were available. We found that on average, diagnostic accuracy in the synthetic mammograms was higher (Az=0.85) than in conventional mammograms (Az=0.81), although the difference was not statistically significant. Preliminary results suggest that the synthesized mammograms are an acceptable alternative for real mammograms regarding the detection of mass lesions.

[1]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Oleg S. Pianykh,et al.  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.

[3]  David Gur,et al.  Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[4]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Investigating Oblique Reconstructions with Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[5]  Serge Muller,et al.  Thick Slices from Tomosynthesis Data Sets: Phantom Study for the Evaluation of Different Algorithms , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Noise model for microcalcification detection in reconstructed tomosynthesis slices , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  A comparison of image interpretation times in full field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[8]  H. Honda,et al.  Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study , 2007, European Radiology.

[9]  A Tingberg,et al.  Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis--initial experiences. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  クリス ルース,et al.  System and method for generating a 2d image from tomosynthesis data set , 2009 .

[11]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-aided detection of masses in full-field digital mammography using screen-film mammograms for training , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  David Gur,et al.  Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[14]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[15]  S. Rose,et al.  Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  David Gur,et al.  Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Federica Zanca,et al.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. , 2012, Radiology.

[18]  Stephen L Hillis,et al.  Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[19]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. , 2013, Medical physics.

[20]  R. L. Birdwell Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Pilot Observer Study , 2009 .

[21]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[22]  Erik Fredenberg,et al.  A photon-counting detector for dual-energy breast tomosynthesis , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[23]  Björn Cederström,et al.  Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors. , 2007, Medical physics.

[24]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Thickness correction of mammographic images by anisotropic filtering and interpolation of dense tissue , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.