Accelerated time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T: clinical experience in 31 patients

AbstractPurpose: To evaluate whether time-resolved 3D MR-angiography at 3T with a net acceleration factor of eight is applicable in clinical routine and to evaluate whether good image quality and a low artifact level can be achieved with a temporal update rate that allows for additional information on pathologies. Materials and methods: Thirty-one consecutive patients underwent time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR-angiography on a 3T system. Imaging consisted of accelerated 3D gradient echo sequences combining parallel imaging with an acceleration factor of four, partial Fourier acquisition along phase and slice encoding direction, and twofold temporal acceleration using view sharing. Data volumes representing the arterial and venous contrast phases were independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists by grading of image quality and artifact level on a 0–3 scale. Results: Time-resolved MR-angiography was successfully performed in all subjects without the need for contrast agent bolus timing. Excellent arterial (average score = 2.65 ± 0.32) and good venous (average score = 2.56 ± 0.28) diagnostic image quality and little image degrading due to artifacts (average score = 2.20 ± 0.16) were confirmed by both independent readers (agreement in 65.2% of all evaluations). In 14 patients vascular pathologies were identified in the arterial phases. In eight examinations temporal resolution and depiction of contrast agent dynamics provided additional information about pathology. Discussion: Without the necessity for additional bolus timing, time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR-angiography with imaging acceleration along both the spatial encoding direction and temporal domain revealed excellent diagnostic image quality in neurovascular and thoracic imaging. Despite the limited spatial resolution as compared to high-resolution imaging of the carotid artery bifurcation, the results demonstrate the applicability of contrast-enhanced MR-angiography in thoracic and abdominal MRA as well as cervical imaging with a temporal update rate allowing for additional information on pathologies. Future studies may include an evaluation of optimal trade-offs between spatial and temporal resolution, different acceleration factors and a comparison to the gold-standard for accuracy.

[1]  Michael Bock,et al.  High‐resolution pulmonary arterio‐ and venography using multiple‐bolus multiphase 3D‐gd‐mRA , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  A. Kassner,et al.  Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[3]  J N Lee,et al.  MR fluoroscopy: Technical feasibility , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  C. Fink,et al.  Time-resolved echo-shared parallel MRA of the lung: observer preference study of image quality in comparison with non-echo-shared sequences , 2005, European Radiology.

[5]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Hiroto Hatabu,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced pulmonary MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Richard Frayne,et al.  3D Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced MR DSA: Advantages and tradeoffs , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  S J Riederer,et al.  Performance of an elliptical centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breath‐hold three‐dimensional gradient echo imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  M. Prince.  Peripheral vascular MR angiography: the time has come. , 1998, Radiology.

[11]  Timothy J Carroll,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography using time‐resolved vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Effect of Inspiratory and Expiratory Breathhold on Pulmonary Perfusion: Assessment by Pulmonary Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[13]  R R Edelman,et al.  Dynamic three‐dimensional magnetic resonance abdominal angiography and perfusion: Implementation and preliminary experience , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  S J Riederer,et al.  Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. , 1997, Radiology.

[15]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[17]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Head and Neck at 3.0 Tesla: Initial Results , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[18]  Martin Requardt,et al.  Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Chest: Combination of Parallel Imaging With View Sharing (TREAT) , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[19]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  David G Norris,et al.  High field human imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  James F Glockner,et al.  Combination of 2D sensitivity encoding and 2D partial fourier techniques for improved acceleration in 3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  R Frayne,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Martin Requardt,et al.  Whole‐body MR angiography using a novel 32‐receiving‐channel MR system with surface coil technology: First clinical experience , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  W. Yuh,et al.  Multiphase Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Abdominal and Pelvic Arteries: Results of a Bicenter Multireader Analysis , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[25]  W. Yuh,et al.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography , 2002, European Radiology.

[26]  Klaas P Pruessmann,et al.  Parallel Imaging at High Field Strength: Synergies and Joint Potential , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[27]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  In vitro validation of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Precision, accuracy, and signal‐to‐noise ratios , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  J. Debatin,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis , 2001, The Lancet.

[29]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal‐to‐noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32‐channel cardiac coil , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. , 2005, Radiology.