Multi-perspective survey of the relevance of the revised bloom's taxonomy to an introduction to linux course
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Margaret Hamilton,et al. A taxonomic study of novice programming summative assessment , 2009, ACE '09.
[2] Peter W. Airasian,et al. The Role of Assessment in the Revised Taxonomy , 2002 .
[3] John Leaney,et al. Introductory programming, criterion-referencing, and bloom , 2003, SIGCSE.
[4] Ursula Fuller,et al. Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomy , 2007, ACM SIGCSE Bull..
[5] Dave Oliver,et al. This Course Has A Bloom Rating Of 3.9 , 2004, ACE.
[6] Benjamin S. Bloom,et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .
[7] Errol Thompson,et al. Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment , 2008, ACE '08.
[8] Judy Kay,et al. Over-confidence and confusion in using bloom for programming fundamentals assessment , 2012, SIGCSE '12.
[9] Duane Buck,et al. JKarelRobot: a case study in supporting levels of cognitive development in the computer science curriculum , 2001, SIGCSE '01.
[10] Alessio Gaspar,et al. Applying the revised Bloom's taxonomy of the cognitive domain to linux system administration assessments , 2012 .
[11] John Leaney,et al. First Year Programming: Let All the Flowers Bloom , 2003, ACE.