Crows Spontaneously Exhibit Analogical Reasoning

Analogical reasoning is vital to advanced cognition and behavioral adaptation. Many theorists deem analogical thinking to be uniquely human and to be foundational to categorization, creative problem solving, and scientific discovery. Comparative psychologists have long been interested in the species generality of analogical reasoning, but they initially found it difficult to obtain empirical support for such thinking in nonhuman animals (for pioneering efforts, see [2, 3]). Researchers have since mustered considerable evidence and argument that relational matching-to-sample (RMTS) effectively captures the essence of analogy, in which the relevant logical arguments are presented visually. In RMTS, choice of test pair BB would be correct if the sample pair were AA, whereas choice of test pair EF would be correct if the sample pair were CD. Critically, no items in the correct test pair physically match items in the sample pair, thus demanding that only relational sameness or differentness is available to support accurate choice responding. Initial evidence suggested that only humans and apes can successfully learn RMTS with pairs of sample and test items; however, monkeys have subsequently done so. Here, we report that crows too exhibit relational matching behavior. Even more importantly, crows spontaneously display relational responding without ever having been trained on RMTS; they had only been trained on identity matching-to-sample (IMTS). Such robust and uninstructed relational matching behavior represents the most convincing evidence yet of analogical reasoning in a nonprimate species, as apes alone have spontaneously exhibited RMTS behavior after only IMTS training.

[1]  Joël Fagot,et al.  Generalized Relational Matching by Guinea Baboons (Papio papio) in Two-by-Two-Item Analogy Problems , 2011, Psychological science.

[2]  J. Fagot,et al.  Analogical reasoning in baboons (Papio papio): Flexible reencoding of the source relation depending on the target relation , 2013, Learning & Behavior.

[3]  Kent D. Bodily,et al.  Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning. , 2007, Comparative cognition & behavior reviews.

[4]  A A Smirnova,et al.  Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. , 2000, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  David Premack,et al.  The codes of man and beasts , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  J. Vonk Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and orangutan (Pongo abelii) understanding of first- and second-order relations , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[7]  Timothy M. Flemming,et al.  Baboons, like humans, solve analogy by categorical abstraction of relations , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[8]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Same/Different Concept Learning by Capuchin Monkeys in Matching-to-Sample Tasks , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  O. Håstad,et al.  Differences in color vision make passerines less conspicuous in the eyes of their predators. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Roger K. R. Thompson,et al.  Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman primates: the paleological monkey and the analogical ape , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Book Reviews: The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences , 2000, CL.

[12]  P. Hayes,et al.  Analogy , 2000, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[13]  E. Wasserman Development and evolution of cognition: One doth not fly into flying! , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Onur Güntürkün,et al.  The convergent evolution of neural substrates for cognition , 2012, Psychological research.

[15]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Discriminating the relation between relations: the role of entropy in abstract conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio) and humans (Homo sapiens). , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  R. K. Thompson,et al.  Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  N. Emery Cognitive ornithology: the evolution of avian intelligence , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. Fagot,et al.  Relational matching in baboons (Papio papio) with reduced grouping requirements. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  Reasoning in the Chimpanzee: I. Analogical Reasoning , 1981 .