Extensions of intelligent tutoring paradigms to support collaborative learning

Intelligent training systems with rich underlying knowledge in systematic form can readily be extended to incorporate collaborative learning possibilities. We have realized this as we have built two generations of intelligent coached practice environments for learning to diagnose failures of complex electronic systems. Using standard artificial intelligence and object-oriented programming approaches, we built a work domain simulation in which students could diagnose electronic system failures. Intelligent, context-sensitive advice is available, and it is tailored to a model of the student’s developing knowledge. Reflection opportunities after solving a problem include a variety of tools for examining one’s performance and comparing it to that of an expert. With this base, it is straightforward to extend self-critique to peer critique, to support teams of students working together, and to allow students to pose problems to each other. We discuss these possibilities and show what is needed to extend intelligent training systems to include them.

[1]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Effects of scripted cooperation and knowledge maps on the processing of technical material , 1989 .

[2]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Problem Solving in the Mathematics Curriculum. A Report, Recommendations, and an Annotated Bibliography. MAA Notes, Number 1. , 1983 .

[3]  N. Webb.  Predicting learning from student interaction: Defining the interaction variables , 1983 .

[4]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Sherlock: A Coached Practice Environment for an Electronics Troubleshooting Job. , 1988 .

[5]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[6]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments , 1989 .

[7]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[8]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  J. Tudge.  Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives , 1989 .

[10]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[11]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[12]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[13]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1988, Cognitive Science.

[14]  Gr Parslow.  Machine Mediated Learning: A quarterly journal from Taylor and Francis Ltd, Rankine Road, Basingstoke, Hants RG24 0PR, UK. Annual subscription US$50 (personal) and $98 (institutional) , 1990 .

[15]  J. Sweller,et al.  What do students learn while solving mathematics problems , 1985 .

[16]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[17]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Process versus Product: A Perspective on Tools for Communal and Informal Electronic Learning , 1985 .

[18]  Allan Collins,et al.  THE COMPUTER AS A TOOL FOR LEARNING THROUGH REFLECTION , 1986 .

[19]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[20]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Apprenticeship training in the workplace: computer-coached practice environment as a new form of apprenticeship , 1989 .

[21]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[22]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). , 1901 .