Welfare gain of controlling emission from cement manufacturing factories in the South-western Bangladesh

Purpose Emission of the suspended particulate matter (SPM) from cement factories results in a wide range of negative health effects to its workers. It induces substantial cost incurred by them in the form of wage loss and mitigation cost. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to estimate emission-induced cost of illness (COI) and the share of this cost that could be saved through limiting the current emission level at national safety standard. Design/methodology/approach COI approach which accounts workers’ wage loss and mitigation cost due to emission-induced illness was used in this study. A sample of 120 workers from three factories followed by 40 from each was randomly surveyed for collecting information on their health status and mitigation cost. It covered almost 10 percent of cement factory workers in the south-west region of Bangladesh. In addition, factory-specific emission data were also collected from the Department of Environment for addressing the study objective. Findings It revealed that the average level of SPM emission by these factories which was almost three times higher than the national safety standard induced 34.39 million Bangladeshi Taka (BDT) (USD0.46 million) as COI paid by workers yearly. It accounted around 28 percent of their annual income of which 64 percent worth BDT22.16 (USD0.30) million could be saved by meeting the standard annually. Originality/value This study provides insights into the essence of regulating cement industrialists toward meeting the national safety standard of emission.

[1]  Andy H. Lee,et al.  Zero‐inflated Poisson regression with random effects to evaluate an occupational injury prevention programme , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Air pollution and daily mortality: a review and meta analysis. , 1994, Environmental research.

[3]  B. Ostro,et al.  Air pollution and mortality: results from a study of Santiago, Chile. , 1996, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[4]  Euston Quah,et al.  The economic cost of particulate air pollution on health in Singapore , 2003 .

[5]  A. Alberini,et al.  Cost-of-Illness and Willingness-to-Pay Estimates of the Benefits of Improved Air Quality: Evidence from Taiwan , 2000 .

[6]  A. Peters,et al.  Short-term effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory morbidity in asthmatic children. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[7]  J D Spengler,et al.  Effects of inhalable particles on respiratory health of children. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  Syed Sana,et al.  Health Risks Associated With Workers in Cement Factories , 2013 .

[9]  M. Z. Haider,et al.  Optimal use of pesticide for paddy production in the south-west region of Bangladesh , 2017 .

[10]  D. Dockery,et al.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Friedrich,et al.  Effective pollutant emission heights for atmospheric transport modelling based on real-world information. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[12]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Is Daily Mortality Associated Specifically with Fine Particles? , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  U. Gupta Valuation of Urban Air Pollution: A Case Study of Kanpur City in India , 2008 .

[14]  M. Kampa,et al.  Human health effects of air pollution. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[15]  Anna Alberini,et al.  The Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control in Delhi , 1997 .

[16]  V I Iyawe,et al.  Influence of smoking on respiratory symptoms and lung function indices in sawmill workers in Benin City, Nigeria. , 2006, Nigerian journal of physiological sciences : official publication of the Physiological Society of Nigeria.