Molecular basis of interactions between SH3 domain-containing proteins and the proline-rich region of the ubiquitin ligase Itch

The ligase Itch plays major roles in signaling pathways by inducing ubiquitylation-dependent degradation of several substrates. Substrate recognition and binding are critical for the regulation of this reaction. Like closely related ligases, Itch can interact with proteins containing a PPXY motif via its WW domains. In addition to these WW domains, Itch possesses a proline-rich region (PRR) that has been shown to interact with several Src homology 3 (SH3) domain-containing proteins. We have previously established that despite the apparent surface uniformity and conserved fold of SH3 domains, they display different binding mechanisms and affinities for their interaction with the PRR of Itch. Here, we attempt to determine the molecular bases underlying the wide range of binding properties of the Itch PRR. Using pulldown assays combined with mass spectrometry analysis, we show that the Itch PRR preferentially forms complexes with endophilins, amphyphisins, and pacsins but can also target a variety of other SH3 domain-containing proteins. In addition, we map the binding sites of these proteins using a combination of PRR sub-sequences and mutants. We find that different SH3 domains target distinct proline-rich sequences overlapping significantly. We also structurally analyze these protein complexes using crystallography and molecular modeling. These structures depict the position of Itch PRR engaged in a 1:2 protein complex with β-PIX and a 1:1 complex with the other SH3 domain-containing proteins. Taken together, these results reveal the binding preferences of the Itch PRR toward its most common SH3 domain-containing partners and demonstrate that the PRR region is sufficient for binding.

[1]  T. Straatsma,et al.  THE MISSING TERM IN EFFECTIVE PAIR POTENTIALS , 1987 .

[2]  R. Kingston,et al.  Calcium Phosphate Transfection , 2003, Current protocols in cell biology.

[3]  P. McPherson,et al.  The HECT Domain Ligase Itch Ubiquitinates Endophilin and Localizes to the trans-Golgi Network and Endosomal System* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  J. Omichinski,et al.  Multiple Src Homology 3 Binding to the Ubiquitin Ligase Itch Conserved Proline-Rich Region. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[5]  Roman A. Laskowski,et al.  LigPlot+: Multiple Ligand-Protein Interaction Diagrams for Drug Discovery , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  P. Permi,et al.  Recognition of tandem PxxP motifs as a unique Src homology 3-binding mode triggers pathogen-driven actin assembly , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Michnick,et al.  Evolution of domain–peptide interactions to coadapt specificity and affinity to functional diversity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Nir London,et al.  Sub‐angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins , 2010, Proteins.

[9]  F. L. Szeto,et al.  Kinetics of Src Homology 3 Domain Association with the Proline-rich Domain of Dynamins , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[12]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  J M Thornton,et al.  LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[14]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method , 1981 .

[15]  M. Sudol,et al.  The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline‐rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[16]  Ivan Dikic,et al.  Atypical Polyproline Recognition by the CMS N-terminal Src Homology 3 Domain* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  T. Sakmar,et al.  A Novel Interaction between Atrophin-interacting Protein 4 and β-p21-activated Kinase-interactive Exchange Factor Is Mediated by an SH3 Domain* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  Robertson Craig,et al.  TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. , 2004, Bioinformatics.

[19]  Martin Phillips,et al.  Toward the structural genomics of complexes: crystal structure of a PE/PPE protein complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  D. Gay,et al.  Cbl- and Nedd4-family ubiquitin ligases: balancing tolerance and immunity , 2008, Immunologic research.

[21]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  Katrin Rittinger,et al.  Molecular Basis of Phosphorylation-Induced Activation of the NADPH Oxidase , 2003, Cell.

[23]  D. Rotin,et al.  Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  Javier Ruiz-Sanz,et al.  The promiscuous binding of the Fyn SH3 domain to a peptide from the NS5A protein. , 2012, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  Andreas P. Eichenberger,et al.  Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7 , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.

[26]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[27]  R. Malik,et al.  Novel Roles for the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Atrophin-interacting Protein 4 and Signal Transduction Adaptor Molecule 1 in G Protein-coupled Receptor Signaling* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  A. Angers,et al.  The ubiquitin ligase Itch mediates the antiapoptotic activity of epidermal growth factor by promoting the ubiquitylation and degradation of the truncated C‐terminal portion of Bid , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[29]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[30]  Ora Schueler-Furman,et al.  Rosetta FlexPepDock web server—high resolution modeling of peptide–protein interactions , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  F. Lévy,et al.  The E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch regulates sorting nexin 9 through an unconventional substrate recognition domain , 2010, The FEBS journal.

[32]  G Cesareni,et al.  Selection of ligands by panning of domain libraries displayed on phage lambda reveals new potential partners of synaptojanin 1. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[34]  M. Zvelebil,et al.  Fas ligand is targeted to secretory lysosomes via a proline-rich domain in its cytoplasmic tail. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[35]  L. Castagnoli,et al.  The SH3 Domains of Endophilin and Amphiphysin Bind to the Proline-rich Region of Synaptojanin 1 at Distinct Sites That Display an Unconventional Binding Specificity* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[37]  Silvia Wuertenberger,et al.  A single PXXP motif in the C‐terminal region of srGAP3 mediates binding to multiple SH3 domains , 2015, FEBS letters.

[38]  V. Anggono,et al.  Syndapin I and endophilin I bind overlapping proline‐rich regions of dynamin I: role in synaptic vesicle endocytosis , 2007, Journal of neurochemistry.

[39]  Berk Hess,et al.  GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers , 2015 .

[40]  Daniela Hoeller,et al.  Cbl promotes clustering of endocytic adaptor proteins , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[41]  A. Hoelz,et al.  Crystal structure of the SH3 domain of betaPIX in complex with a high affinity peptide from PAK2. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  David Fenyö,et al.  Mass spectrometric protein identification using the global proteome machine. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[43]  T. Hunter,et al.  NeW Wrinkles for an Old Domain , 2000, Cell.

[44]  H. Hosaka,et al.  Targeting AMAP1 and cortactin binding bearing an atypical src homology 3/proline interface for prevention of breast cancer invasion and metastasis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.