Student Self Grading: Perception vs. Reality

The purpose of student self-grading is explored to discover not only students’ perception of grades but their experience with self-grading in college. Before student self-grading may be deemed a valid practice of accessing student learning, it is important for researchers to define how students perceive letter grades. Data was collected via a brief email survey from 144 undergraduate Public Health majors at a mid-size liberal arts college. Results indicate that students used three major categories in defining their perceptions of what each letter grade represent – Knowledge, Effort and Assignment, along with three minor categories – Learning, Critical Thinking and Success. Results also indicate that only about a third of participants actually engaged in self-grading in college and out of those who, do about 65% indicate that they graded themselves harder than their professors. These findings have implications for the discrepancies that may exist between professors vs. students’ perception of grade representation and ultimately the effectiveness of student self-grading in the classroom.

[1]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Authentic assessment in action : studies of schools and students at work , 1995 .

[2]  H. Andrade Students as the Definitive Source of Formative Assessment: Academic Self-Assessment and the Self-Regulation of Learning , 2010 .

[3]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Student Self-Assessment of Higher-Order Cognitive Skills in College Science Teaching. , 1997 .

[4]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  External Evaluation, Task Difficulty, and Continuing Motivation , 1985 .

[5]  Richard L. Weaver,et al.  Peer evaluation: A case study , 1986 .

[6]  Paul Black,et al.  Changing the Subject: Innovations in Science, Maths and Technology Education , 1996 .

[7]  Uri Zoller,et al.  Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS , 1993 .

[8]  Nancy Falchikov,et al.  PRODUCT COMPARISONS AND PROCESS BENEFITS OF COLLABORATIVE PEER GROUP AND SELF ASSESSMENTS , 1986 .

[9]  Paul Black,et al.  Changing the subject , 2005 .

[10]  Gavin T. L. Brown Student self-assessment , 2013 .

[11]  William M. Stallings,et al.  Freedom from External Evaluation. , 1972 .

[12]  A. Chur-Hansen,et al.  Medical students’ essay‐writing skills: criteria‐based self‐ and tutor‐evaluation and the role of language background , 2000, Medical education.

[13]  B. Bloom Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[14]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  C. Rees Self‐assessment scores and gender , 2003, Medical education.

[16]  David Boud,et al.  THE ROLE OF SELF‐ASSESSMENT IN STUDENT GRADING , 1989 .

[17]  Carol Rolheiser,et al.  Skills training versus action research in-service: impact on student attitudes to self-evaluation , 1998 .

[18]  Steven D. Kamm,et al.  Examination‐Type Preferences of College Science Students and Their Faculty in Israel and USA: A Comparative Study , 1997 .

[19]  Judith A. Arter The Impact of Training Students To Be Self-Assessors of Writing. , 1994 .

[20]  John R. Baird,et al.  Learning from the PEEL experience , 1992 .

[21]  D. Boud,et al.  Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[22]  S. Carmichael,et al.  Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course. , 2005, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[23]  Peter D. MacIntyre,et al.  Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency : The role of language anxiety , 1997 .

[24]  D. S. Lind,et al.  Competency-based student self-assessment on a surgery rotation. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[25]  P. Alexander,et al.  Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge , 1991 .

[26]  Dylan Wiliam,et al.  Classroom Assessment: Minute by Minute, Day by Day In classrooms that use assessment to support learning, teachers continually adapt instruction to meet student needs. , 2005 .

[27]  James H. Block,et al.  1: Mastery Learning , 1976 .