Taming Chaos. Chance and Variability in the Language Sciences

This paper focuses on chance and variability in language, and how the language sciences have dealt with that variability. After describing four types of variability found: (a) Inter-species variability, (b) Inter-language variability, (c) Variability in the linguistic signal within a given language, and (d) Inter-individual variability, the paper discusses the work of two pioneers who have tried to deal with this variability: Joseph H. Greenberg and William Labov. These near-contemporaries have tried to grapple with variability of types (b) and (c), as two separate enterprises. Thus these researchers have tried to separate pure chance or randomness from meaningful variability in two different ways, and in doing so have tried to tame the chaos. For them indeed the mission of linguistics as a discipline is to eliminate chance as much as possible, as the target of any scientific enterprise by definition is to isolate, separate or exclude what cannot be explained or understood. Nonetheless, chance and variability are key elements in language, and a proper understanding of language will take these as the point of departure. What does it mean to say that chance is an inherent property of human language? The paper outlines the beginning of answer to this question.

[1]  F. D. Saussure.  Cours de linguistique générale , 1924 .

[2]  W. Köhler.  Gestalt psychology , 1967 .

[3]  R. Jakobson.  Why "Mama" and "Papa"? , 1972 .

[4]  J. Ohala.  The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[5]  D. Sankoff,et al.  The Universal Consistency Hypothesis and the Prediction of Word Order Acquisition Stages in the Speech of Bilingual Children , 1984 .

[6]  Talmy Givón,et al.  Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax , 1985 .

[7]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.

[8]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.

[9]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[10]  Christian Abry,et al.  Major trends in vowel system inventories , 1997 .

[11]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga,et al.  Features, Gestures, and Igbo Vowels: An Approach to the Phonology-Phonetics Interface , 1997 .

[12]  László Cseresnyési.  Hinton, Leanne; Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John J. (eds.). Sound Symbolism , 1997 .

[13]  J. Stroop.  Poldernederlands; waardoor het ABN verdwijnt , 1998 .

[14]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[15]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language , 2001 .

[16]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change , 2002, Language Variation and Change.

[17]  C. Gussenhoven.  On the origin and development of the Central Franconian tone contrast , 2003 .

[18]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns , 2004 .

[19]  J. Ohala.  Sound Symbolism , 2004, Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online.

[20]  V. V. Heuven,et al.  Pronunciation of /Ei/ in avantgarde Dutch: a cross-sex acoustic study , 2005 .

[21]  Academisch Proefschrift,et al.  On variation and change in diphthongs and long vowels of spoken Dutch , 2009 .

[22]  Robert Forkel,et al.  The World Atlas of Language Structures Online , 2009 .

[23]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[24]  J. Wohlgemuth,et al.  Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity , 2010 .

[25]  Keren Rice,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Phonology , 2011 .

[26]  Richard J. Wiese,et al.  The Representation of Rhotics , 2011 .

[27]  Simon J. Greenhill,et al.  Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals , 2011, Nature.

[28]  YU ALANC.L.,et al.  Individual differences in socio-cognitive processing and the actuation of sound change , 2012 .

[29]  J. Ohala.  The listener as a source of sound change , 2012 .

[30]  A. Yu.  Individual differences in socio‐cognitive processing and sound change , 2013 .

[31]  K. Sebregts.  The Sociophonetics and Phonology of Dutch r , 2015 .

[32]  Howard GCiles.  ACCENT MOBILITY: A MODEL AND SOME DATA , 2016 .

[33]  R. S. W. Mendl.  PATTERNS IN SOUND , 2022 .