Time travel proxy: using lightweight video recordings to create asynchronous, interactive meetings

Time Travel Proxy (TTP) enables participating in meetings that you cannot attend in real time, either because of time conflicts or global time zone differences. TTP uses lightweight video recordings to pre-record your contributions to a meeting, which are played on a tablet that serves as a proxy for you during the meeting. Reactions and responses in the meeting are also captured in video to give you feedback of what happened at the meeting. A working prototype of TTP was deployed and studied within four developer teams in their daily stand-up meetings. The study found that the affordances of video helped integrate the time traveler into the social context of the meeting, although the current prototype was better at enabling the time traveler to contribute to the meeting than it was in conveying the meeting experience back to the time traveler.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[2]  Tom Gross,et al.  VideoPal: Exploring Asynchronous Video-Messaging to Enable Cross-Cultural Friendships , 2011, ECSCW.

[3]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Catchup: a useful application of time-travel in meetings , 2010, CSCW '10.

[4]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces , 1988, CSCW '88.

[5]  John C. Tang,et al.  Embodied social proxy: mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams , 2010, CHI.

[6]  John C. Tang,et al.  Your time zone or mine?: a study of globally time zone-shifted collaboration , 2011, CSCW.

[7]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[8]  A. Noll,et al.  Teleconferencing communications activities , 1976, Communications Society.

[9]  Andrew Begel,et al.  Usage and Perceptions of Agile Software Development in an Industrial Context: An Exploratory Study , 2007, First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007).

[10]  Andrew Begel,et al.  Usage and Perceptions of Agile Software Development in an Industrial Context: An Exploratory Study , 2007, ESEM 2007.

[11]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Video-Mediated Communication , 1997 .

[12]  Brian S. Drummond,et al.  Yahoo! Distributed Agile: Notes from the World Over , 2008, Agile 2008 Conference.

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Steven E. Poltrock,et al.  A team collaboration space supporting capture and access of virtual meetings , 2001, GROUP.

[15]  Craig Larman,et al.  Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide , 2003 .

[16]  James H. Watt,et al.  The Influence of Synchrony and Sensory Modality on the Person Perception Process in Computer-Mediated Groups , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Necessity of a Meeting Recording and Playback System, and the Benefit of Topic-Level Annotations to Meeting Browsing , 2005, INTERACT.