Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity.

Increased use of personality inventories in employee selection has led to concerns regarding factors that influence the validity of such measures. A series of studies was conducted to examine the influence of frame of reference on responses to a personality inventory. Study 1 involved both within-subject and between-groups designs to assess the effects of testing situation (general instructions vs. applicant instructions) and item type (work specific vs. noncontextual) on responses to the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (P. T. Costa & R. R. McCrae, 1989). Results indicated that a work-related testing context and workrelated items led to more positive responses. A second study found differences in the validity of a measure of conscientiousness, depending on the frame of reference of respondents. Specifically, context-specific items were found to have greater validity. Implications for personnel selection are discussed.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  C. Windle.  Test-Retest Effect on Personality Questionnaires , 1954 .

[3]  K. Jöreskog.  Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests , 1971 .

[4]  D. P. Schwab.  ISSUES IN RESPONSE DISTORTION STUDIES OF PERSONALITY INVENTORIES: A CRITIQUE AND REPLICATED STUDY , 1971 .

[5]  W. Mischel.  Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. , 1973, Psychological review.

[6]  M. Gordon,et al.  A Critique of Methods for Operationalizing the Concept of Fakeability , 1978 .

[7]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[8]  R Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic theory of personality. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[9]  Seymour Adler,et al.  Personality and organizational behavior. , 1984 .

[10]  R. Kanfer,et al.  Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. , 1985, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  H. J. Bernardin.  Personality assessment in organizations , 1985 .

[12]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Personality and social behavior , 1985 .

[13]  D. Zuroff.  Was Gordon Allport a trait theorist , 1986 .

[14]  G. Lautenschlager.  Within-Subject Measures for the Assessment of Individual Differences in Faking , 1986 .

[15]  W. Mischel,et al.  A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  K. Lanning.  Individual differences in scalability: An alternative conception of consistency for personality theory and measurement. , 1988 .

[17]  A. Thorne.  Conditional Patterns, Transference, and the Coherence of Personality Across Time , 1989 .

[18]  D. Buss,et al.  Personality psychology : recent trends and emerging directions , 1989 .

[19]  W. Mischel,et al.  Intuitive interactionism in person perception: effects of situation--behavior relations on dispositional judgments. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. , 1990 .

[22]  Newell K. Eaton,et al.  Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities , 1990 .

[23]  S. Dollinger,et al.  Personality and performance in "personality": Conscientiousness and openness. , 1991 .

[24]  P. Costa,et al.  Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory☆ , 1991 .

[25]  W. Chaplin,et al.  The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[26]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[27]  R. Hogan.  Personality and personality measurement. , 1991 .

[28]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[29]  K. Murphy.  Personnel Selection in Organizations , 1992 .

[30]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management , 1992 .

[31]  L. A. Pervin.  Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[32]  I. Robertson.  Personality assessment and personnel selection , 1993 .

[33]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  The Big Five in Personnel Selection: Factor Structure in Applicant and Nonapplicant Populations , 1993 .

[34]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[35]  Y Shoda,et al.  The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[37]  D. Moskowitz.  Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. , 1994 .

[38]  B. Roberts,et al.  One personality, multiple selves: integrating personality and social roles. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[39]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors , 1994 .

[40]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Effects of Self-Presentation Strategies on Personality Profiles and their Structure , 1995 .

[41]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  The five-factor model of personality : theoretical perspectives , 1996 .

[42]  P. Costa,et al.  Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. , 1996 .