Gender Differences in Job Assignment and Promotion on a Complexity Ladder of Jobs

This paper studies gender differences in the allocation of workers across jobs of different complexity using panel data on Finnish metalworkers. These data provide a measure for the complexity of the workers' tasks that can be used to construct a complexity ladder of jobs. We study whether women have to meet higher productivity requirements than men in order to be assigned to more complex tasks. Gender differences in the promotion rates are examined. We use productivity measures that are based on the supervisors' performance evaluations and examine gender differences in the productivity of promoted and non-promoted workers. It is found that women start their careers in less complex tasks than men and that they are also less likely to get promoted than men who start in similar tasks. When we compare the productivity of men and women, both at the initial assignment and when some of these individuals have been promoted, we find that there is no gender-related productivity differential at the time of the initial assignment, but women become on average more productive than men afterwards, both in promoted and non-promoted subsets. The most plausible interpretation of these results is that women face a higher promotion threshold than men.

[1]  P. Lundborg.  Taxes, Risk Aversion and Unemployment Insurance as Causes of Wage Rigidity , 2000 .

[2]  Sten Johansson,et al.  Arbetslöshetsförsäkringen och arbetslösheten - En reanalys av IFAUs studie , 2000 .

[3]  George P. Baker,et al.  The Internal Economics of the Firm: Evidence from Personnel Data , 1994 .

[4]  Annika Alexius.  How to Beat the Random Walk , 2001 .

[5]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Enriching a Theory of Wage and Promotion Dynamics inside Firms , 1999, Journal of Labor Economics.

[6]  J. Persson,et al.  Economic Growth, Inequality, Democratization, and the Environment , 2003 .

[7]  Peter Skogman Thoursie,et al.  Incentives and Selection in Cyclical Absenteeism , 2005 .

[8]  Lennart Erixon.  The 'Third Way' Revisited. A Revaluation of the Swedish Model in the Light of Modern Economics , 2000 .

[9]  L. Granqvist,et al.  Gender differences in career mobility-an example from the wholesale and retail trade by , 2022 .

[10]  Trade, Earnings, and Mobility - , 2000 .

[11]  James P. Ziliak,et al.  Cracks in the Glass Ceiling: Gender and Promotion in the Economics Profession , 1999 .

[12]  A. Larsson.  The Swedish real exchange rate under different currency regimes , 2004 .

[13]  S. Johansson.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life for National Policy , 2002 .

[14]  A. Ichino,et al.  Productivity, seniority and wages: new evidence from personnel data , 2001 .

[15]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-Time Duration Models , 1995 .

[16]  D. Ginther,et al.  Gender Differences in Salary and Promotion in the Humanities , 1999 .

[17]  Annika Alexius,et al.  Measures of Technology and the Business Cycle: Evidence from Sweden and the U.S.* , 2001 .

[18]  J. Antelius.  Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education: Evidence on Swedish Data , 2000 .

[19]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  Male-Female Wage Differentials in Job Ladders , 1990, Journal of Labor Economics.

[20]  F. Heyman.  Wage Dispersion and Job Turnover: Evidence from Sweden , 2002 .

[21]  Kristin McCue.  Promotions and Wage Growth , 1996, Journal of Labor Economics.

[22]  J. Selen,et al.  Mandatory Earnings-Related Insurance Rights, Human Capital and the Gender Earnings Gap in Sweden* , 2002 .

[23]  R. Winter‐Ebmer,et al.  Unequal Assignment and Unequal Promotion in Job Ladders , 1997, Journal of Labor Economics.

[24]  A. Booth,et al.  A sticky floors model of promotion, pay, and gender , 2003 .

[25]  D. Ginther,et al.  Gender Differences in Salary and Promotion for Faculty in the Humanities, 1977-95 , 2001 .

[26]  P. Lundborg,et al.  Is There a Long Run Unemployment-Inflation Trade-off in Sweden? , 2001 .

[27]  Sten Hansen,et al.  Direkta undanträngningseffekter av arbetsmarknadspolitiska åtgärder , 2001 .

[28]  J. Antelius,et al.  Competition, Market Structure and Job Turnover , 2003 .

[29]  T. Strauss.  Structural Reforms, Uncertainty, and Private Investment , 2000 .

[30]  Lena Nekby.  Gender differences in rent sharing and its implications for the gender wage gap, evidence from Sweden , 2002 .

[31]  Mahmood Arai,et al.  Wages, Profits and Individual Unemployment Risk : Evidence from Matched Worker-Firm Data , 2001 .

[32]  T. Strauss.  Economic Reforms and the Poor , 2000 .

[33]  P. Gustavsson.  The Dynamics of European Industrial Structure , 2002 .

[34]  Mahmood Arai,et al.  Immigrants' and Natives' Unemployment-risk: Productivity Differentials or Discrimination? , 2001 .

[35]  Pär Hansson.  Skill Upgrading and Production Transfer within Swedish Multinationals , 2001 .

[36]  Per-Anders Edin,et al.  Trade, earnings and mobility : Swedish evidence , 2000 .

[37]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Gender Differences in Promotions and Wages , 1996 .

[38]  David R. Jones,et al.  Equal Worth, Equal Opportunities: Pay and Promotion in an Internal Labour Market , 1996 .

[39]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  A Theory of Wage Dynamics , 1982 .

[40]  Gary Solon,et al.  Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education , 1987 .

[41]  Francine D. Blau,et al.  Discrimination: Empirical Evidence from the United States , 1987 .

[42]  J. Treble,et al.  The internal economics of the firm: further evidence from personnel data , 2001 .

[43]  Sten Johansson,et al.  Arbetslöshetsförsäkringen och arbetslösheten(2). Reformeffekt vid 1993 års sänkning av ersättningsgraden i arbetslöshetsförsäkringen , 2001 .

[44]  J. Selen.  Taxable income responses to tax changes - a panel analysis of the 1990/91 Swedish reform* , 2002 .

[45]  R. Topel,et al.  Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men , 1988 .