A new sequential method for three-phase immiscible flow in poroelastic media

Abstract A new computational model is developed to solve three phase immiscible compressible flow in strongly heterogeneous poroelastic media. Within the context of the iterative coupled formulation based on the fixed stress split algorithm the governing equations are decomposed into three subsystems associated with the geomechanics, hydrodynamics and transport problems. The hydrodynamics involves an overall compressibility which plays essential role in the magnitude of additional source in the pressure equation associated the time derivative of the total mean stress. We show that the additional coefficients in the source can be decomposed into a rock/grain and fluid components involving the formation volume factors of each phase. The flow equations are written in a proper conservative form for application of mixed-hybrid formulation whereas the nonlinear coupling between flow and transport is handled by a proper sequential iterative scheme. A new post-processing approach is proposed to update the Lagrangian porosity based on the freezing of the total mean stress which reproduces the one-way formulation in a straightforward fashion under the stationarity of the total mean stress. The geomechanical subsystem is also discretized by a mixed formulation based on the decomposition of the effective stress into spherical and deviatoric components in order to handle the nearly-incompressible undrained limit. The system of conservation laws for the liquid saturations is rephrased in an alternative form for an appropriate operator splitting method, leading to the appearance of an extra source term arising from the transient behavior of the Lagrangian porosity induced by the geomechanical coupling. Within the framework of a predictor–corrector scheme, the predictor step is discretized by an extended version of a higher order central-upwind scheme whereas the corrector, which captures the influence of rock skeleton deformation upon transport, is captured by a Godunov splitting. The potential of the new computational model is illustrated in numerical simulations of water-flooding and of WAG (Water Alternating Gas) injection problems in poroelastic media. Numerical results illustrate precisely the role of the transient nature of the total stress upon subsidence, rock compaction, oil and gas production and finger grow in primary and secondary recovery regimes.

[1]  Radek Fučík,et al.  Mixed-hybrid finite element method for modelling two-phase flow in porous media (Czech Japanese Seminar in Applied Mathematics 2010 : Praha/Telc, September 2010) , 2012 .

[2]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[3]  Antonin Settari,et al.  Advances in Coupled Geomechanical and Reservoir Modeling With Applications to Reservoir Compaction , 2001 .

[4]  H. Tchelepi,et al.  Multiscale finite-volume formulation for multiphase flow in porous media: black oil formulation of compressible, three-phase flow with gravity , 2008 .

[5]  Hussein Hoteit,et al.  An efficient numerical model for incompressible two-phase flow in fractured media , 2008 .

[6]  R. LeVeque Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems: Characteristics and Riemann Problems for Linear Hyperbolic Equations , 2002 .

[7]  Felipe Pereira,et al.  A new computational strategy for solving two‐phase flow in strongly heterogeneous poroelastic media of evolving scales , 2012 .

[8]  P. Longuemare,et al.  Geomechanics in Reservoir Simulation: Overview of Coupling Methods and Field Case Study , 2002 .

[9]  T. Patzek,et al.  Multiscale Numerical Modeling of Three-Phase Flow , 2003 .

[10]  Clint Dawson,et al.  Semi discrete discontinuous Galerkin methods and stage-exceeding-order, strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta time discretizations , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  Patrick Jenny,et al.  Adaptive fully implicit multi-scale finite-volume method for multi-phase flow and transport in heterogeneous porous media , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[12]  Maicon R. Correa,et al.  A semi‐discrete central scheme for scalar hyperbolic conservation laws with heterogeneous storage coefficient and its application to porous media flow , 2013 .

[13]  O. Redlich,et al.  On the thermodynamics of solutions; an equation of state; fugacities of gaseous solutions. , 1949, Chemical reviews.

[14]  Nicola Castelletto,et al.  Scalable algorithms for three-field mixed finite element coupled poromechanics , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  Magne S. Espedal,et al.  Continuous-time finite element analysis of multiphase flow in groundwater hydrology , 1994 .

[16]  D. W. Peaceman Fundamentals of numerical reservoir simulation , 1977 .

[17]  M. Biot,et al.  THE ELASTIC COEFFICIENTS OF THE THEORY OF CONSOLIDATION , 1957 .

[18]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  A multiscale fixed stress split iterative scheme for coupled flow and poromechanics in deep subsurface reservoirs , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  A. Settari,et al.  New Iterative Coupling Between a Reservoir Simulator and a Geomechanics Module , 2004 .

[20]  Abimael F. D. Loula,et al.  On stability and convergence of finite element approximations of biot's consolidation problem , 1994 .

[21]  Radek Fucík,et al.  Discontinous Galerkin and Mixed-Hybrid Finite Element Approach to Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media with Different Capillary Pressures , 2011, ICCS.

[22]  D. Arnold Mixed finite element methods for elliptic problems , 1990 .

[23]  Hussein Hoteit,et al.  Numerical modeling of two-phase flow in heterogeneous permeable media with different capillarity pressures , 2008 .

[24]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Iteratively coupled mixed and Galerkin finite element methods for poro‐elasticity , 2007 .

[25]  Malgorzata Peszynska,et al.  Staggered in time coupling of reservoir flow simulation and geomechanical deformation: Step 1 - one-way coupling , 1999 .

[26]  Yuanle Ma,et al.  Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media , 2007, Math. Comput..

[27]  Marcio R. Borges,et al.  A new locally conservative numerical method for two-phase flow in heterogeneous poroelastic media , 2013 .

[28]  Vivette Girault,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations - Theory and Algorithms , 1986, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics.

[29]  Pierre Samier,et al.  Comparisons of Uncoupled and Various Coupling Techniques for Practical Field Examples , 2006 .

[30]  H. Tchelepi,et al.  Adaptive Multiscale Finite-Volume Framework for Reservoir Simulation , 2007 .

[31]  Andro Mikelić,et al.  Convergence of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geomechanics , 2013, Computational Geosciences.

[32]  Richard E. Ewing,et al.  Comparison of Various Formulations of Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media , 1997 .

[33]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[34]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes , 1998, Math. Comput..

[35]  Charles M. Stone,et al.  A Comparison of Techniques for Coupling Porous Flow and Geomechanics , 2006 .

[36]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Strong Stability-Preserving High-Order Time Discretization Methods , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[37]  Malgorzata Peszynska,et al.  Coupled fluid flow and geomechanical deformation modeling , 2003 .

[38]  Joshua A. White,et al.  Accuracy and convergence properties of the fixed‐stress iterative solution of two‐way coupled poromechanics , 2015 .

[39]  Ruben Juanes,et al.  Stability and convergence of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics: Drained and undrained splits , 2011 .

[40]  Vidar Thomée,et al.  Asymptotic behavior of semidiscrete finite-element approximations of Biot's consolidation problem , 1996 .

[41]  Mladen Jurak,et al.  A new formulation of immiscible compressible two-phase flow in porous media , 2008 .

[42]  Ruben Juanes,et al.  Stability, Accuracy and Efficiency of Sequential Methods for Coupled Flow and Geomechanics , 2009 .

[43]  J. Nédélec Mixed finite elements in ℝ3 , 1980 .

[44]  J. Mandel Consolidation Des Sols (Étude Mathématique) , 1953 .

[45]  S. Osher,et al.  Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes,II , 1989 .

[46]  E. Tadmor,et al.  New High-Resolution Central Schemes for Nonlinear Conservation Laws and Convection—Diffusion Equations , 2000 .

[47]  D. Nayagum,et al.  Modelling Two-Phase Incompressible Flow in Porous Media Using Mixed Hybrid and Discontinuous Finite Elements , 2004 .

[48]  Jan M. Nordbotten,et al.  Robust iterative schemes for non-linear poromechanics , 2017, Computational Geosciences.

[49]  Ehsan Heidaryan,et al.  Modified RedlichKwong equation of state for supercritical carbon dioxide , 2013 .

[50]  M. Fortin,et al.  Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications , 2013 .

[51]  E.L.M. Garcia,et al.  New Locally Conservative Numerical Schemes for Hydrogeomechanical Couplings in Strongly Heterogeneous Presalt Reservoirs , 2013, ANSS 2013.

[52]  Maicon R. Correa,et al.  A semi-discrete central scheme for incompressible multiphase flow in porous media in several space dimensions , 2017, Math. Comput. Simul..

[53]  Alexander Kurganov,et al.  Semidiscrete Central-Upwind Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws and Hamilton-Jacobi Equations , 2001, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[54]  Jan M. Nordbotten,et al.  Full Pressure Coupling for Geo-mechanical Multi-phase Multi-component Flow Simulations , 2015, ANSS 2015.

[55]  A. Cheng,et al.  Mandel's problem revisited , 1996 .

[56]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[57]  A. Skempton THE PORE-PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS A AND B , 1954 .

[58]  D. Arnold,et al.  Mixed and nonconforming finite element methods : implementation, postprocessing and error estimates , 1985 .