Position dependence of amino acid intrinsic helical propensities II: Non‐charged polar residues: Ser, Thr, Asn, and Gln

The assumption that the intrinsic α‐helical propensities of the amino acids are position independent was critical in several helix/coil transition theories. In the first paper of these series, we reported that this is not the case for Gly and nonpolar aliphatic amino acids (Val, Leu, Met, and Ile). Here we have analyzed the helical intrinsic propensities of noncharged polar residues (Ser, Thr, Asn, and Gln) at different positions of a model polyalanine‐based peptide. We found that Thr is more favorable (by ∼0.3 kcal/mol) at positions N1 and N2 than in the helix center, although for Ser, Asn, and Gln the differences are smaller (±0.2 kcal/mol), and in many cases within the experimental error. There is a reasonable agreement (±0.2 kcal/mol) between the calculated free energies, using the ECEPP/2 force field equipped with a hydration potential, and the experimental data, except at position N1.

[1]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters. II. Helix macrodipole effects and rational modification of the helical content of natural peptides. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  G. Millhauser,et al.  Estimating the relative populations of 3(10)-helix and alpha-helix in Ala-rich peptides: a hydrogen exchange and high field NMR study. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Position dependence of non-polar amino acid intrinsic helical propensities. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[6]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Swindells,et al.  Intrinsic φ,ψ propensities of amino acids, derived from the coil regions of known structures , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  Y H Chen,et al.  Determination of the helix and beta form of proteins in aqueous solution by circular dichroism. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[9]  A. H. Juffer,et al.  Comparison of atomic solvation parametric sets: Applicability and limitations in protein folding and binding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  G. Rose,et al.  α‐Helix‐forming propensities in peptides and proteins , 1994 .

[11]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Aromatic side-chain contribution to far-ultraviolet circular dichroism of helical peptides and its effect on measurement of helix propensities. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[12]  G Vriend,et al.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. , 1990, Journal of molecular graphics.

[13]  C. Deber,et al.  Peptides in membranes: Helicity and hydrophobicity , 1995, Biopolymers.

[14]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Helix propagation and N‐cap propensities of the amino acids measured in alanine‐based peptides in 40 volume percent trifluoroethanol , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  J Moult,et al.  Role of electrostatic screening in determining protein main chain conformational preferences. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[16]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Stability of alpha-helices. , 1995, Advances in protein chemistry.

[17]  L Serrano,et al.  Helix design, prediction and stability. , 1995, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[18]  L M Amzel,et al.  Estimation of changes in side chain configurational entropy in binding and folding: General methods and application to helix formation , 1994, Proteins.

[19]  Uwe Sauer,et al.  Dissection of helix capping in T4 lysozyme by structural and thermodynamic analysis of six amino acid substitutions at Thr 59 , 1993 .

[20]  B. Matthews,et al.  Structural basis of amino acid alpha helix propensity. , 1993, Science.

[21]  J. Richardson,et al.  Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. , 1988, Science.

[22]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  L Serrano,et al.  Elucidating the folding problem of alpha-helices: local motifs, long-range electrostatics, ionic-strength dependence and prediction of NMR parameters. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  L Serrano,et al.  Development of the multiple sequence approximation within the AGADIR model of alpha-helix formation: comparison with Zimm-Bragg and Lifson-Roig formalisms. , 1997, Biopolymers.

[26]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Conformational analysis of the 20 naturally occurring amino acid residues using ECEPP. , 1977, Macromolecules.

[27]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Intrinsic secondary structure propensities of the amino acids, using statistical ϕ–ψ matrices: Comparison with experimental scales , 1994 .

[28]  A. Doig,et al.  Side-chain structures in the first turn of the alpha-helix. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Chris Sander,et al.  The double cubic lattice method: Efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Side chain–backbone hydrogen bonding contributes to helix stability in peptides derived from an α‐helical region of carboxypeptidase A , 1991, Proteins.

[31]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  N‐ and C‐capping preferences for all 20 amino acids in α‐helical peptides , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.