Four-day Follow-up Study on the Self-reported Voice Condition and Noise Condition of Teachers: Relationship Between Vocal Parameters and Classroom Acoustics.

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the changes in self-reported voice and noise condition over a follow-up of 4 days (equivalent to one working week), to define the relationship between the objective voice parameters and the self-reported voice condition, as well as to characterize the relationship between classroom acoustics and the self-reported noise condition. STUDY DESIGN This is a cohort study. METHODS We performed voice monitoring of 27 teachers for four working days using the Voice-Care device, which provides information on the fundamental frequency, vocal sound pressure level, and phonation time percentage. The participants performed a pre-monitoring, which consisted of a brief conversation, before each monitoring session, and filled in a questionnaire after each monitored lesson, in which they indicated their opinions about their voice condition and the classroom noise conditions. RESULTS The teachers who, during the pre-monitoring, showed a higher standard deviation of the vocal sound pressure level and a greater phonation time percentage difference between the entire monitoring and the pre-monitoring sessions, reported fewer voice complaints. Decay time (DT40ME), a reverberation measure from the speakers' perspective, resulted to be associated with the self-reporting of the noise condition. CONCLUSION Voice disorders at work prevention programs should include strategies to exercise the respiratory and laryngeal components of voice production, because these elements may influence the variation in the vocal sound pressure level, which was found to be significantly associated with the self-reported voice condition. This study also highlights the importance of including reverberation measures, from the speakers' perspective, in the design of schools.

[1]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Working-Day Effects on the Spectral Characteristics of Teaching Voice , 1998, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[2]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Measurement and prediction of voice support and room gain in school classrooms. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E Vilkman,et al.  Relationship between subjective voice complaints and acoustic parameters in female teachers' voices. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[4]  Alex Burdorf,et al.  Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: a systematic review. , 2013, Journal of communication disorders.

[5]  Pasquale Bottalico,et al.  Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B. Hammarberg,et al.  Speaking Fundamental Frequency and Phonation Time during Work and Leisure Time in Vocally Healthy Preschool Teachers Measured with a Voice Accumulator , 2013, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[7]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Speaker-Oriented Classroom Acoustics Design Guidelines in the Context of Current Regulations in European Countries , 2014 .

[8]  J. Oates,et al.  Vocal problems among teachers: a review of prevalence, causes, prevention, and treatment. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[9]  Erkki Vilkman,et al.  Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[10]  Angelo Farina,et al.  ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS IN OPERA HOUSES: COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES AND EQUIPMENT , 2000 .

[11]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Traceability and uncertainty of vocal parameters estimated through a contact microphone , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA).

[12]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Influence of classroom acoustics on the voice levels of teachers with and without voice problems: A field study. , 2010 .

[13]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Design Issues for a Portable Vocal Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Julián Preciado-López,et al.  Epidemiological study of voice disorders among teaching professionals of La Rioja, Spain. , 2008, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[15]  Erkki Vilkman,et al.  Relationships between self-evaluations of voice and working conditions, background factors, and phoniatric findings in female teachers , 2009, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[16]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Speakers' comfort and voice level variation in classrooms: laboratory research. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Alex Burdorf,et al.  Effects of noise and acoustics in schools on vocal health in teachers , 2015, Noise & health.

[18]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Variations in intensity, fundamental frequency, and voicing for teachers in occupational versus nonoccupational settings. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Voice changes during work: subjective complaints and objective measurements for female primary and secondary schoolteachers. , 2002, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[20]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Validation of calibration procedures and uncertainty estimation of contact-microphone based vocal analyzers , 2015 .

[21]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[22]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A. NACCI,et al.  Clinical Techniques and Technology , 2022 .

[24]  N. Williams,et al.  Occupational groups at risk of voice disorders: a review of the literature. , 2003, Occupational medicine.

[25]  Viveka Lyberg Åhlander,et al.  Teachers' Voice Use in Teaching Environments: A Field Study Using Ambulatory Phonation Monitor. Teachers’ voice use in teaching environments: A field study using Ambulatory Phonation Monitor , 2015 .

[26]  E. Luschei,et al.  Control of vocal loudness in young and old adults. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[27]  D. Spini,et al.  An Introduction to Generalized Estimating Equations and an Application to Assess Selectivity Effects in a Longitudinal Study on Very Old Individuals , 2004 .

[28]  E. Vilkman,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of Voice and Working Conditions and Phoniatric Examination in Kindergarten Teachers , 2011, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.