A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture

Microtomography (micro-computed-tomography, μ-CT) is a method to image and quantify trabecular bone. It has the capability to address the role of trabecular architecture on the mechanical properties of bone and to study trabecular bone remodeling. The system described in this work is based on a compact fan-beam type tomograph that can work in spiral scanning or multislice mode. An X-ray tube with a microfocus is used as a source, a CCD-array as a detector. Samples with diameters from a few millimeters to a maximum of 14 mm can be measured, typically, bone biopsies with a diameter of 8 mm and a length of approximately 10 mm are measured. Spatial resolution is 28 μm. Usually the volume of interest contains 4×4×4 mm3 and is represented in 14×14×14 μm3 voxels. 3D stereological indices are extracted according to the standard definitions used in histomorphometry. Triangular surface representation is effected with an extended marching cube algorithm and forms a convenient basis for finite element analysis. Microtomographic measurements may be employed to “calibrate” lower-dose, lower-resolution imagesin vivo as well as to nondestructively assess unprocessed surgical bone biopsy specimens. These specimens remain intact for mechanical or histological testing.

[1]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[2]  G. V. B. Cochran,et al.  Relationships between bone structure in the iliac crest and bone structure and strength in the lumbar spine , 1993, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  K Andersen,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of entire vertebral bodies. , 1994, Bone.

[4]  U. Bonse,et al.  3D computed X-ray tomography of human cancellous bone at 8 microns spatial and 10(-4) energy resolution. , 1994, Bone and mineral.

[5]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  H. Kopera,et al.  Briefe an die Redaktion , 1989, Klinische Wochenschrift.

[7]  P M Joseph,et al.  The effects of sampling on CT images. , 1980, Computerized tomography.

[8]  M. Hahn,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Imaging of Bone Mineral Using Computed Microtomography: Comparison with Microradiography and Undecalcified Histologic Sections , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[9]  J. Kinney,et al.  In vivo, three‐dimensional microscopy of trabecular bone , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  A. Parfitt Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units (summary of proposed system). , 1988, Bone.

[11]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Resolution dependency of microstructural properties of cancellous bone based on three-dimensional mu-tomography. , 1996, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[12]  W. J. Whitehouse The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. , 1993, Bone.

[15]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Application of homogenization theory to the study of trabecular bone mechanics. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. T. DeHoff,et al.  Experimental determination of the topological properties of three‐dimensional microstructures , 1972 .

[17]  E LorensenWilliam,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987 .

[18]  M. Hahn,et al.  Trabecular Microarchitecture of the Human Spine , 1989 .

[19]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  R. Miiller,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element modelling of non-invasively assessed trabecular bone structures , 1995 .

[21]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  G H Glover,et al.  Theoretical Resolution of Computed Tomography Systems , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Consequences of the remodelling process for vertebral trabecular bone structure: a scanning electron microscopy study (uncoupling of unloaded structures). , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[25]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.