Complete percutaneous excision of infiltrating carcinoma at stereotactic breast biopsy: how can tumor size be assessed?

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of complete excision of infiltrating carcinoma at stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy and to evaluate the feasibility of measuring tumor size in stereotactic biopsy specimens in infiltrating carcinomas that were percutaneously excised. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed retrospective review of 51 infiltrating carcinomas diagnosed using stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy that underwent subsequent surgery. For lesions yielding no residual infiltrating carcinoma at surgery, the maximal dimension of the tumor was measured in stereotactic biopsy specimens using ocular micrometry. RESULTS In 10 (20%) (95% confidence intervals, 9.8-33.1%) of 51 infiltrating carcinomas diagnosed at stereotactic biopsy, surgery revealed no residual infiltrating carcinoma. Complete excision of infiltrating carcinoma was more frequent if 14 or more specimens were obtained (32% versus 0%, p < .004), if the mammographic lesion was removed (35% versus 7%, p < .03), and if the mammographic lesion size measured 0.7 cm or less (50% versus 16%, p = .08). Tumor size in stereotactic biopsy specimens was within 3 mm of mammographic lesion size in six (60%) of 10 lesions, including five (71%) of seven masses and one (33%) of three calcification lesions, but was smaller than the mammographic lesion size in eight (80%) of 10 lesions. CONCLUSION Surgery revealed no residual infiltrating carcinoma in 10 (20%) of 51 infiltrating carcinomas diagnosed at stereotactic 11-gauge biopsy. Although tumor size can be assessed in stereotactic biopsy specimens in these lesions, such measurements may underestimate the maximal dimension of the tumor. Further study is needed to evaluate the usefulness of these measurements in guiding treatment decisions.

[1]  D. Dershaw,et al.  Imaging Guided Biopsy: An Alternative to Surgical Biopsy , 2000, The breast journal.

[2]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Correlation of tumor size and axillary lymph node involvement with prognosis in patients with T1 breast carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[3]  S. Tahan,et al.  Microscopic localization of calcifications in and around breast carcinoma: a cautionary note for needle core biopsies. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[4]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  E. Moskovic,et al.  Ultrasound in breast carcinoma: what are we looking at? A sonographic/pathological correlation , 1998 .

[6]  L. Liberman,et al.  Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. , 1998, Radiology.

[7]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Do prognostic marker studies on core needle biopsy specimens of breast carcinoma accurately reflect the marker status of the tumor? , 1998, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[8]  F. Burbank,et al.  Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability, and usefulness as a guide for wire localization. , 1997, Radiology.

[9]  S. Parker,et al.  Performing a breast biopsy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  L. Liberman,et al.  Mammographic findings after stereotactic 14-gauge vacuum biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[12]  F. Burbank Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[13]  S. Nordling,et al.  Preoperative assessment of proliferative activity and hormonal receptor status in carcinoma of the breast: A comparison of needle aspiration and needle‐core biopsies to the surgical specimen , 1996, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[14]  C. Zuiani,et al.  Large core biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of invasive breast carcinomas. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[15]  C. Hudis,et al.  Adjuvant drug therapy for operable breast cancer. , 1996, Seminars in oncology.

[16]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Invasive breast cancer: mammographic measurement. , 1996, Radiology.

[17]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. , 1995, Radiology.

[18]  L. Norton,et al.  Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  B. Fornage,et al.  Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size , 1987, Cancer.

[20]  S. Groshen,et al.  Survival and prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: results of long-term follow-up studies. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[21]  I. Gribbestad,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 1992, Acta oncologica.

[22]  C. Redmond,et al.  Systemic therapy in node-negative patients: updated findings from NSABP clinical trials. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.