Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions.

Levin, Schneider, and Gaeth (LSG, 1998) have distinguished among three types of framing-risky choice, attribute, and goal framing-to reconcile conflicting findings in the literature. In the research reported here, we focus on attribute and goal framing. LSG propose that positive frames should be more effective than negative frames in the context of attribute framing, and negative frames should be more effective than positive frames in the context of goal framing. We test this framework by manipulating frame valence (positive vs negative) and frame type (attribute vs goal) in a unified context with common procedures. We also argue that the nature of effects in a goal-framing context may depend on the extent to which the research topic has "intrinsic self-relevance" to the population. In the context of medical decision making, we operationalize low intrinsic self-relevance by using student subjects and high intrinsic self-relevance by using patients. As expected, we find complete support for the LSG framework under low intrinsic self-relevance and modified support for the LSG framework under high intrinsic self-relevance. Overall, our research appears to confirm and extend the LSG framework. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[2]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[3]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making , 1986 .

[4]  S. Chaiken.  The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[5]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Associative effects of information framing , 1987 .

[7]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Information framing effects in social and personal decisions , 1988 .

[8]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[9]  I. Levin,et al.  Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles , 1988 .

[10]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Beyond Fear Appeals: Negative and Positive Persuasive Appeals to Health and Self‐Esteem , 1988 .

[11]  T. Marteau,et al.  Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. , 1989, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Framing the problem and making decisions: the facts are not enough , 1989 .

[13]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysis , 1989 .

[15]  B. Hailey,et al.  The Effects of Message Framing and Feelings of Susceptibility to Breast Cancer on Reported Frequency of Breast Self-Examination , 1989, International quarterly of community health education.

[16]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Windows of vulnerability or cognitive illusions? Cognitive processes and the nuclear arms race , 1989 .

[17]  D. Lauver,et al.  Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[18]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[20]  Effects of framing and mathematical experience on judgments , 1992 .

[21]  P. Homer,et al.  Message Framing and the Interrelationships among Ad-Based Feelings, Affect, and Cognition , 1992 .

[22]  Philip M. J. Reckers,et al.  An examination of tax practitioner decisions: The role of preparer sanctions and framing effects associated with client condition , 1993 .

[23]  Kenneth J. Dunegan.  Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. , 1993 .

[24]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[25]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  AIDS risk perceptions and decision biases. , 1993 .

[26]  V. J. Steffen,et al.  Practice and Persuasive Frame: Effects on Beliefs, Intention, and Performance of a Cancer Self‐Examination1 , 1994 .

[27]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Procedural Justice and Survivors Reactions to Job Layoffs , 1995 .

[28]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior , 1995 .

[29]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[30]  Wang.  Framing Effects: Dynamics and Task Domains , 1996, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[31]  Kenneth J. Dunegan.  Fines, Frames, and Images: Examining Formulation Effects on Punishment Decisions , 1996 .

[32]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference , 1997 .

[33]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[35]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Looking Closer at the Effects of Framing on Risky Choice: An Item Response Theory Analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[36]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. , 1998 .

[37]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing Perceptions of Vulnerability: Personal Relevance and the Use of Experiential Information in Health Judgments , 1998 .