Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance

Firm performance is a relevant construct in strategic management research and frequently used as a dependent variable. Despite this relevance, there is hardly a consensus about its definition, dimensionality and measurement, what limits advances in research and understanding of the concept. This article proposes and tests a measurement model for firm performance, based on subjective indicators. The model is grounded in stakeholder theory and a review of empirical articles. Confirmatory Factor Analyses, using data from 116 Brazilian senior managers, were used to test its fit and psychometric properties. The final model had six first-order dimensions: profitability, growth, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, social performance, and environmental performance. A second-order financial performance construct, influencing growth and profitability, correlated with the first-order intercorrelated, non-financial dimensions. Results suggest dimensions cannot be used interchangeably, since they represent different aspects of firm performance, and corroborate the idea that stakeholders have different demands that need to be managed independently. Researchers and practitioners may use the model to fully treat performance in empirical studies and to understand the impact of strategies on multiple performance facets.

[1]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[2]  John H. Freeman,et al.  PROFITABILITY, TRANSACTIONAL ALIGNMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONAL MORTALITY IN THE U.S. TRUCKING INDUSTRY , 1997 .

[3]  J. Baum,et al.  STRATEGIC DECISION SPEED AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[4]  Christopher L. Shook,et al.  The Dimensionality of Organizational Performance and its Implications for Strategic Management Research , 2005 .

[5]  R. Mueller.  Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS , 1996 .

[6]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[7]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis: Text and Readings , 1979 .

[8]  Pierre J. Richard,et al.  Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice , 2009 .

[9]  I. Sila,et al.  Critical linkages among TQM factors and business results , 2005 .

[10]  Raymond F. Zammuto,et al.  A comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness , 1984 .

[11]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[12]  D. Teece,et al.  Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda , 1994 .

[13]  K. Cameron,et al.  A Study of Organizational Effectiveness and Its Predictors , 1983 .

[14]  J. Barney,et al.  Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 2007 .

[15]  K. Cameron.  Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[16]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[17]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[18]  D. Whetten.  Organizational Growth and Decline Processes , 1987 .

[19]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .

[20]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[21]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[22]  Michael C. Jensen,et al.  VALUE MAXIMIZATION, STAKEHOLDER THEORY, AND THE CORPORATE OBJECTIVE FUNCTION , 2001 .

[23]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  Quality of Management and Quality of Stakeholder Relations , 1997 .

[24]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Survey research. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  Luis Antonio Dib,et al.  Building a Better Measure of Business Performance , 2009 .

[26]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[27]  Ismail Sila,et al.  Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: An empirical study , 2007 .

[28]  B. Chakravarthy.  Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[29]  J. Dawes.  The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Company Performance Measures in Market Orientation Research: Further Empirical Evidence , 1999 .

[30]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[31]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[32]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms , 2004 .

[33]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[34]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[35]  Richard M. Steers.  Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness , 1975 .

[36]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses , 2003 .

[37]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[38]  Stanley E. Seashore,et al.  Factorial Analysis of Organizational Performance , 1967 .

[39]  T. Wall,et al.  On the validity of subjective measures of company performance , 2004 .

[40]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[41]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Measuring Organizational Performance: Metrics for Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Research , 2007 .

[42]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  M. C. Jensen.  Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function , 2001 .

[44]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[45]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[46]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  The contribution of quality to business performance , 1996 .

[47]  W. Glenn Rowe,et al.  A Note on the Dimensionality of the Firm Financial Performance Construct Using Accounting, Market, and Subjective Measures , 2009 .

[48]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES: KNOWLEDGE-BASED RESOURCES, ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES , 2003 .

[49]  Jeff W. Trailer,et al.  Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research , 1996 .

[50]  James E. Storbeck,et al.  Pluralistic views of performance , 2003 .

[51]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Strategy type and performance : The influence of sales force management , 2000 .

[52]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[53]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction? , 2004 .

[54]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[55]  Jeff Frooman.  Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[56]  Mingfang Li,et al.  Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: a theoretical integration and an empirical test , 2000 .

[57]  Stuart Jay Deutsch,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness: A Multiple-Constituency Approach , 1980 .

[58]  William H. Glick,et al.  The Myth of Firm Performance , 2013 .

[59]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[60]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[61]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[62]  Jose M. Arau.  Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function , 2002 .

[63]  M. Hitt,et al.  Construct measurement in strategic management research: illusion or reality? , 2005 .

[64]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  Business Performance Measurement , 2007 .

[65]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance , 2004 .

[66]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[67]  James G. Combs,et al.  Strategic resources and performance: a meta‐analysis , 2008 .

[68]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[69]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-Unit-Level Relationship Between Employee Satisfaction, , 2002 .