Laparoscopic nephrectomy outside gerota fascia and en bloc ligation of the renal hilum for management of inflammatory renal diseases

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aims to improve laparoscopic nephrectomy techniques for inflammatory renal diseases (IRD) and to reduce complications. Materials and Methods Thirty-three patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy for IRD, with a method of outside Gerota fascia dissection and en-bloc ligation and division of the renal pedicle. Operative time, blood loss, complications, analgesia requirement, post-operative recovery of intestinal function and hospital stay were recorded. The degrees of perinephric adhesion were classified based on the observation during operation and post-operative dissection of the specimen, and the association of different types of adhesion with the difficulty of the procedures was examined. Results Among 33 cases, three were converted to hand-assisted laparoscopy, and one was converted to open surgery. Mean operative time was 99.6±29.2min, and blood loss was 75.2±83.5 mL. Postoperative recovery time of intestinal function was 1.6±0.7 days and average hospital stay was 4.8±1.4 days. By classification and comparison of the perinephric adhesions, whether inflammation extending beyond Gerota fascia or involving renal hilum was found to be not only an important factor influencing the operative time and blood loss, but also the main reason for conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopy or open surgery. Conclusions In laparoscopic nephrectomy, outside Gerota fascia dissection of the kidney and en-bloc ligation of the renal pedicle using EndoGIA could reduce the difficulty of procedure and operative time, with satisfactory safety and reliability. Inflammation and adhesion extending beyond Gerota fascia or involving renal hilum is an important predictor of the difficulty related to laparoscopic nephrectomy for IRD.

[1]  I. Geçit,et al.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy in non-functioning inflammatory kidneys with or without renal stone. , 2015, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[2]  S. Dragićević,et al.  Diagnostic and therapeutic protocol in the treatment of hypo functional kidney. , 2014, Acta chirurgica iugoslavica.

[3]  C. Coogan,et al.  829 ROUTINE EN BLOC STAPLING OF THE RENAL HILUM DURING LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE , 2013 .

[4]  C. D'ancona,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis – Are there predictive factors for success? , 2012, Clinics.

[5]  J. Lee,et al.  1433 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF EN BLOC STAPLING OF RENAL HILUM DURING LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL , 2012 .

[6]  Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar,et al.  Ürolojik laparoskopik cerrahi: Dicle üniversitesindeki ilk 100 deneyimimiz , 2012 .

[7]  G. Sung,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a retrospective analysis of multi‐center results , 2011, BJU international.

[8]  P. Pierorazio,et al.  Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: presentation and management in the era of laparoscopy , 2009, BJU international.

[9]  M. Srougi,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy outside gerota fascia for management of inflammatory kidney. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[10]  M. Desai,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign and inflammatory conditions. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[11]  Benjamin R. Lee,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: Contemporary outcomes analysis. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[12]  R. Goyal,et al.  Is laparoscopic nephrectomy the preferred approach in xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis? , 2006, Urology.

[13]  L. Gomella,et al.  Outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in technically challenging cases. , 2006, Urology.

[14]  R. Shah,et al.  Laparoscopic and open surgical nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[15]  M. Tobias-Machado,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy in inflammatory renal disease: proposal for a staged approach. , 2005, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[16]  Z. Ye,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic subcapsular nephrectomy for infective nonfunctioning kidney with dense perinephric adhesions , 2004, BJU international.

[17]  S. Bhayani,et al.  Vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[18]  C. Kwak,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidney: comparison with laparoscopic simple nephrectomy for other diseases. , 2002, Urology.

[19]  M. Meng,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal conditions. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[20]  R. Clayman,et al.  Is the laparoscopic approach justified in patients with xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis? , 1999, Urology.

[21]  D. Tolley,et al.  A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. , 1998, British journal of urology.

[22]  S. Nakada,et al.  Hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: comparison to standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[23]  N. Gupta,et al.  Tubercular pyelonephritic nonfunctioning kidney--another relative contraindication for laparoscopic nephrectomy: a case report. , 1997, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[24]  S. Nakada,et al.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: technical considerations. , 1997, Techniques in urology.

[25]  T. Ahlering,et al.  Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: clinical findings and surgical considerations. , 1994, Urology.

[26]  L R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[27]  J. Rassweiler,et al.  [Value of commercial enzyme immunoassays in the determination of prostatic acid phosphatase]. , 1988, Der Urologe (Ausg. A).