Earthquake reconnaissance missions have been very successful in identifying the specific causes of failure for individual buildings and the deficiencies in building codes or local construction practices that have led to these; however, their ability to capture robust statistics on patterns of failure is usually beyond their scope. Furthermore, the success of these endeavours in establishing poor construction designs and practices, means that if we are to continue to learn new lessons we will need to gain fresh insights using new data streams. Recent technological advances have the ability to enable us to both increase the amount of data collected and to improve on the precision of these measurements. Furthermore, social media has the potential to provide entirely new data streams and to significantly add value to collected data by harnessing an army of data manipulators and interpreters. How to do this in a reliable way however, is the subject of much debate. In this paper, we explore the potential for a number of trialled and potential technologies to collect better and new information in earthquake reconnaissance, including virtual damage surveying where results from damage surveys completed in the field, are compared to omnidirectional images collected during the mission and interpreted by a virtual surveyor based in the UK, data collected through aerial images taken by UAVs and 3D models created from a series of drone or other images. Finally, we describe the potential of social media such as Twitter to collect data streams on damage and other impacts. Examples of impact data such as road closures, landslips and infrastructure service failures collected for flooding and landslide will be presented to show the potential of this technology for earthquakes. 1 School of Engineering, Newcastle University (email: sean.wilkinson@ncl.ac.uk) 2 Dept of Civil, Environ &Geomatic Eng, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT 3 Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, 1-5 Scroope Terrace, Cambridge, CB2 1PX 11NCEE. Proceedings of the 11th National Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA. 2018. How Can New technologies Help Us With Earthquake Reconnaissance? S Wilkinson, H Stone, D D’Ayala, E Verrucci, P James, T Rossetto E So and C Ellul
[1]
Rajiv Ranjan,et al.
Urban Risk Analytics in the Cloud
,
2017,
IT Prof..
[3]
S. M. Wilkinson,et al.
Observations of damage to buildings from Mw 7.6 Padang earthquake of 30 September 2009
,
2012,
Natural Hazards.
[4]
D. Leibovici,et al.
Rapid flood inundation mapping using social media, remote sensing and topographic data
,
2017,
Natural Hazards.
[5]
Luke S. Smith,et al.
Assessing the utility of social media as a data source for flood risk management using a real‐time modelling framework
,
2017
.
[6]
Jan-Peter Muller,et al.
Evaluating sub-pixel offset techniques as an alternative to D-InSAR for monitoring episodic landslide movements in vegetated terrain
,
2014
.
[7]
C. Narain.
Did you feel that?
,
2005,
Nature Neuroscience.
[8]
Feasibility of Remote Sensing for Multihazard Analysis of Landslides in Padang Pariaman during the 2009 Padang Earthquake
,
2015
.
[9]
Robin Spence,et al.
Validating Assessments of Seismic Damage Made from Remote Sensing
,
2011
.
[10]
David J. Wald,et al.
Development of the U.S. Geological Survey's PAGER system (Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response)
,
2008
.
[11]
Fumio Yamazaki,et al.
Construction of 3D models of buildings damaged by earthquakes using UAV aerial images
,
2015
.
[12]
Sean Wilkinson,et al.
Observations and implications of damage from the magnitude Mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand earthquake of 22 February 2011
,
2013,
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.