How do macrophyte distribution patterns affect hydraulic resistances

Abstract In eutrophic river systems, macrophytes attain high biomass with reduced drainage and increased flooding risk. To avoid these problems, water managers remove vegetation. Total removal, however, increases wash out of macro-invertebrate communities reducing the ecological value of rivers. Partial vegetation removal reduces this washout and prevents an increase in hydraulic resistance. In this, study the hydraulic performance of three partial vegetation removal patterns was tested. From the results it was seen that hydraulic resistance, expressed as Manning's n, was varying between 0.025 m−1/3 s and 0.050 m−1/3 s. Compared with the empty situation, the different distribution patterns increased resistance between 14 and 23%. Hydraulic resistance of these patterns was also significantly influenced by the species present in the vegetation patches. Three groups of macrophyte plants (emerged, floating leaved and submerged) with significantly different hydraulic resistances were determined. The emerged species Sparganium erectum generated the least resistance with an average friction of 0.03 m−1/3 s. Stuckenia pectinata and Potamogeton natans had slightly higher friction values around 0.4 m−1/3 s. Ranunculus penicillatus and Callitriche platycarpa had average friction values around 0.05 m−1/3 s. The proposed vegetation removal patterns are good alternatives to create a management system, which minimally increases hydraulic resistance but still guarantees the ecological functions.

[1]  Julian C. Green Effect of macrophyte spatial variability on channel resistance , 2006 .

[2]  Enrique R. Vivoni,et al.  Flow structure in depth-limited, vegetated flow , 2000 .

[3]  P. Meire,et al.  The Re-growth Capacity of Sago Pondweed Following Mechanical Cutting , 2006 .

[4]  J. Paillisson,et al.  Can small water level fluctuations affect the biomass of Nymphaea alba in large lakes , 2006 .

[5]  R. Ferguson,et al.  Velocity and flow resistance in step-pool streams , 2002 .

[6]  E. Luis,et al.  Removal of organic matter and nutrients from urban wastewater by using an experimental emergent aquatic macrophyte system , 1995 .

[7]  G. Janauer,et al.  Aquatic macrophytes and water current velocity in the Danube River , 2010 .

[8]  S. Weisner,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in Phragmites australis as a functional response to water depth , 2001 .

[9]  P. Viaene,et al.  Ecological management of aquatic plants: effects in lowland streams , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[10]  Zhang Guanghui,et al.  Estimating Manning's n for steep slopes , 2003 .

[11]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Long-term phosphorus removal in Florida aquatic systems dominated by submerged aquatic vegetation , 2003 .

[12]  H. Nepf,et al.  Observations of particle capture on a cylindrical collector: Implications for particle accumulation and removal in aquatic systems , 2004 .

[13]  T. Hansen,et al.  Quantitative estimates and community structure of invertebrates in a macrophyte rich stream , 1985, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[14]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes , 2003 .

[15]  G. Janauer,et al.  The measurement of current velocities in macrophyte beds , 1991 .

[16]  Erik Jeppesen,et al.  Growth of macrophytes and ecosystem consequences in a lowland Danish stream , 1989 .

[17]  J. Fisher,et al.  Influence of the seagrass, Zostera marina L., on current flow☆ , 1982 .

[18]  William R. Wise,et al.  Simulating short‐circuiting flow in a constructed wetland: the implications of bathymetry and vegetation effects , 2009 .

[19]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near-bed flow in lowland streams , 1998 .

[20]  Ruh-Ming Li,et al.  EFFECT OF TALL VEGETATIONS ON FLOW AND SEDIMENT , 1973 .

[21]  N. Kouwen,et al.  Friction Factors for Coniferous Trees along Rivers , 2000 .

[22]  Ole Pedersen,et al.  Velocity gradients and turbulence around macrophyte stands in streams , 1999 .

[23]  Michael Trepel,et al.  INFLUENCE OF MACROPHYTES ON WATER LEVEL AND FLOOD DYNAMICS IN A RIVERINE WETLAND IN NORTHERN GERMANY , 2003 .

[24]  David H. Manz,et al.  Numerical analysis of the effects of aquatic weeds on the performance of irrigation conveyance systems , 1988 .

[25]  A. Ogunlela,et al.  Hydraulic roughness of some African grasses , 2000 .

[26]  D. Gutknecht,et al.  Hydraulic resistance of submerged flexible vegetation , 2002 .

[27]  Julian C. Green Modelling flow resistance in vegetated streams: review and development of new theory , 2005 .

[28]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Patch dynamics of the stream macrophyte, Callitriche cophocarpa , 1992 .

[29]  H. Nepf Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation , 1999 .

[30]  Harry L. Jenter,et al.  Drag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida Everglades , 2004 .