A model‐free approach to eliminate autocorrelation when testing for process capability

There is an increasing use of on-line data acquisition systems in industry. This usually leads to autocorrelated data and implies that the assumption of independent observations has to be re-examined. Most decision procedures for capability analysis assume independent data. In this article we present a new way of performing capability analysis when data are autocorrelated. This method is based on what can be called the ‘iterative skipping’ strategy. In that, by skipping a pre-determined number of observations, e.g. considering every fifth observation, the data set is divided into subsamples for which the independence assumption may be valid. For each such subsample of the data we estimate a capability index. Then traditional tests, assuming independence, can be performed based on each estimated capability index from the subsamples. By combining the information from each test statistic based on the subsamples in a suitable way, a new and efficient decision procedure is obtained. We discuss different ways of combining the information from these individual tests. A main appeal of our proposed method is that no time-series model is needed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Henry A. Malec,et al.  Editorial: Quality and reliability engineering on the move , 1999 .

[2]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Process Capability Indices—A Review, 1992–2000 , 2002 .

[3]  Kerstin Vännman,et al.  Distributional properties of estimated capability indices based on subsamples , 2003 .

[4]  G. Box,et al.  Distribution of Residual Autocorrelations in Autoregressive-Integrated Moving Average Time Series Models , 1970 .

[5]  Kerstin Vännman,et al.  A uniformed approach to capability indices , 1995 .

[6]  Rassoul Noorossana,et al.  Process capability analysis in the presence of autocorrelation , 2002 .

[7]  W. L. Pearn,et al.  One‐sided Process Capability Assessment in the Presence of Measurement Errors , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[8]  Fred A. Spiring,et al.  A New Measure of Process Capability: Cpm , 1988 .

[9]  Dennis K. J. Lin,et al.  Another Look at the Process Capability Index , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[10]  Erik Wallgren Properties of the Taguchi capability index for Markov dependent quality characteristics , 1998 .

[11]  Fred A. Spiring,et al.  A Bibliography of Process Capability Papers , 2003 .

[12]  Kerstin Vännman Distribution and moments in simplified form for a general class of capability indices , 1997 .

[13]  Michele Scagliarini,et al.  ESTIMATION OF C p FOR AUTOCORRELATED DATA AND MEASUREMENT ERRORS , 2002 .

[14]  Michele Scagliarini,et al.  Estimation of Cpm when Measurement Error is Present , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[15]  James Durbin,et al.  Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables , 1970 .

[16]  Nien Fan Zhang,et al.  Estimating process capability indexes for autocorrelated data , 1998 .

[17]  Haim Shore,et al.  PROCESS CAPABILITY ANALYSIS WHEN DATA ARE AUTOCORRELATED , 1997 .

[18]  Erik Wallgren,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Process Capability Index Cpk for Autocorrelated Quality Characteristics , 2001 .

[19]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[20]  Kerstin Vännman,et al.  Process capability plots—a quality improvement tool , 1999 .

[21]  Yu-Sheng Hsu,et al.  CAPABILITY MEASURES FOR m-DEPENDENT STATIONARY PROCESSES , 2003 .

[22]  Thomas Mathew,et al.  Generalized confidence intervals for process capability indices , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[23]  Victor E. Kane,et al.  Process Capability Indices , 1986 .