Multiple Chromosomal Rearrangements Structured the Ancestral Vertebrate Hox-Bearing Protochromosomes

While the proposal that large-scale genome expansions occurred early in vertebrate evolution is widely accepted, the exact mechanisms of the expansion—such as a single or multiple rounds of whole genome duplication, bloc chromosome duplications, large-scale individual gene duplications, or some combination of these—is unclear. Gene families with a single invertebrate member but four vertebrate members, such as the Hox clusters, provided early support for Ohno's hypothesis that two rounds of genome duplication (the 2R-model) occurred in the stem lineage of extant vertebrates. However, despite extensive study, the duplication history of the Hox clusters has remained unclear, calling into question its usefulness in resolving the role of large-scale gene or genome duplications in early vertebrates. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of the vertebrate Hox clusters and several linked genes (the Hox “paralogon”) and show that different phylogenies are obtained for Dlx and Col genes than for Hox and ErbB genes. We show that these results are robust to errors in phylogenetic inference and suggest that these competing phylogenies can be resolved if two chromosomal crossover events occurred in the ancestral vertebrate. These results resolve conflicting data on the order of Hox gene duplications and the role of genome duplication in vertebrate evolution and suggest that a period of genome reorganization occurred after genome duplications in early vertebrates.

[1]  Dr. Susumu Ohno.  Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  L. Ohler,et al.  Optimization of long-distance PCR using a transposon-based model system. , 1992, PCR methods and applications.

[3]  C. Kappen,et al.  Evolution of a regulatory gene family: HOM/HOX genes. , 1993, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[4]  L. Lundin,et al.  Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse. , 1993, Genomics.

[5]  M. Nei,et al.  Evolution of Antennapedia-class homeobox genes. , 1996, Genetics.

[6]  Temple F. Smith,et al.  Reconstruction of ancient molecular phylogeny. , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[7]  D. Duboule,et al.  Teleost HoxD and HoxA genes: comparison with tetrapods and functional evolution of the HOXD complex , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[8]  J. Spring,et al.  Vertebrate evolution by interspecific hybridisation – are we polyploid? , 1997, FEBS letters.

[9]  G. Wagner,et al.  Phylogenetic reconstruction of vertebrate Hox cluster duplications. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  A. Hughes,et al.  Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  H. Scherthan,et al.  Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. , 1998, Genome research.

[12]  J. Glass,et al.  Sequencing multimegabase-template DNA with BigDye terminator chemistry. , 1998, Genome research.

[13]  Junhyong Kim,et al.  Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[14]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference , 1999, Molecular Biology and Evolution.

[15]  A. Meyer,et al.  Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  Austin L. Hughes,et al.  Phylogenies of Developmentally Important Proteins Do Not Support the Hypothesis of Two Rounds of Genome Duplication Early in Vertebrate History , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  X. Gu,et al.  Evolutionary Patterns of Gene Families Generated in the Early Stage of Vertebrates , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[18]  P. Holland,et al.  The amphioxus Hox cluster: deuterostome posterior flexibility and Hox14 , 2000, Evolution & development.

[19]  A. Rodrigo,et al.  Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[20]  J. Langeland,et al.  Lamprey Dlx genes and early vertebrate evolution. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Stephen J O'Brien,et al.  Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping , 2001, Genome Biology.

[22]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..

[23]  A. Martín,et al.  Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the "one-to-four rule". , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  Masami Hasegawa,et al.  CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection , 2001, Bioinform..

[25]  P. Ráb,et al.  Chromosome evolution in the Salmonidae (Pisces): an update , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  A. Hughes,et al.  Pattern and timing of gene duplication in animal genomes. , 2001, Genome research.

[27]  A. Hughes,et al.  Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. , 2001, Genome research.

[28]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Homeobox gene clusters and the human paralogy map , 2001, FEBS letters.

[29]  Parvaneh Saeedi,et al.  A physical map of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[30]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira.  An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[31]  D. Larhammar,et al.  The human Hox-bearing chromosome regions did arise by block or chromosome (or even genome) duplications. , 2002, Genome research.

[32]  P. Holland,et al.  Were vertebrates octoploid? , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  Karsten Hokamp,et al.  Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[34]  Xun Gu,et al.  Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[35]  A. Hughes,et al.  The temporal distribution of gene duplication events in a set of highly conserved human gene families. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  M. Holder,et al.  Phylogeny estimation: traditional and Bayesian approaches , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  G. Wagner,et al.  Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[39]  D. Penny,et al.  Outgroup misplacement and phylogenetic inaccuracy under a molecular clock--a simulation study. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[40]  C. Pikaard,et al.  Chromosomal locus rearrangements are a rapid response to formation of the allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica genome , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  P. Donnelly,et al.  The Fine-Scale Structure of Recombination Rate Variation in the Human Genome , 2004, Science.

[42]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[43]  A. Hughes,et al.  2R or not 2R: Testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates , 2004, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.

[44]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  Thomas J Naughton,et al.  Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[46]  J. Bergsten.  A review of long‐branch attraction , 2005, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[47]  T. Marquès-Bonet,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangements are associated with higher rates of molecular evolution in mammals. , 2005, Gene.

[48]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  Two Rounds of Whole Genome Duplication in the Ancestral Vertebrate , 2005, PLoS biology.

[49]  D. Stock.  The Dlx gene complement of the leopard shark, Triakis semifasciata, resembles that of mammals: implications for genomic and morphological evolution of jawed vertebrates. , 2005, Genetics.

[50]  H. Kishino,et al.  Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea , 1989, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[51]  Vincent J. Lynch,et al.  Adaptive evolution of Hox-gene homeodomains after cluster duplications , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[52]  J. Graves,et al.  Reconstruction of a 450-My-old ancestral vertebrate protokaryotype. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[53]  O. Gascuel,et al.  Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[54]  Peter F Stadler,et al.  The "fish-specific" Hox cluster duplication is coincident with the origin of teleosts. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[55]  Y. Kohara,et al.  Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. , 2007, Genome research.

[56]  B. McAllister,et al.  Positive Selection Near an Inversion Breakpoint on the Neo-X Chromosome of Drosophila americana , 2007, Genetics.

[57]  Marie Sémon,et al.  Consequences of genome duplication. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[58]  H. Lehrach,et al.  Early vertebrate whole genome duplications were predated by a period of intense genome rearrangement. , 2008, Genome research.