Towards an articulation of interaction aesthetics

Even though the emerging field of user experience generally acknowledges the importance of aesthetic qualities in interactive products and services, there is a lack of approaches recognizing the fundamentally temporal nature of interaction aesthetics. By means of interaction criticism, I introduce four concepts that begin to characterize the aesthetic qualities of interaction. Pliability refers to the sense of malleability and tightly coupled interaction that makes the use of an interactive visualization captivating. Rhythm is an important characteristic of certain types of interaction, from the sub-second pacing of musical interaction to the hour-scale ebb and flow of peripheral emotional communication. Dramaturgical structure is not only a feature of online role-playing games, but plays an important role in several design genres from the most mundane to the more intellectually sophisticated. Fluency is a way to articulate the gracefulness with which we are able to handle multiple demands for our attention and action in augmented spaces.

[1]  G. W. Teuscher The hand that rocks the cradle... , 1988, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[2]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Visual information seeking: tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays , 1994, CHI '94.

[4]  R. Polynor,et al.  The hand that rocks the cradle , 1995 .

[5]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Augmenting fun and beauty: a pamphlet , 2000, DARE '00.

[6]  Martin Ludvigsen,et al.  Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[7]  Dirk Balfanz,et al.  Mobile liquid 2D scatter space (ML2DSS) , 2004, Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation, 2004. IV 2004..

[8]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Thoughtful interaction design , 2004 .

[9]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[10]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Keepin' it real: pushing the desktop metaphor with physics, piles and the pen , 2006, CHI.

[11]  J. Löwgren Articulating the use qualities of digital designs , 2006 .

[12]  Lev Manovich,et al.  The poetics of augmented space , 2006 .

[13]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[14]  Tomas Sokoler,et al.  Explicit interaction for surgical rehabilitation , 2007, TEI.

[15]  J. Löwgren Fluency as an Experiential Quality in Augmented Spaces , 2007 .

[16]  Oksana Zelenko,et al.  Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design , 2007 .

[17]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  PLIABILITY AS AN EXPERIENTIAL QUALITY: EXPLORING THE AESTHETICS OF INTERACTION DESIGN , 2007 .

[18]  Simon Niedenthal Complicated Shadows: The Aesthetic Significance of Simulated Illumination in Digital Games , 2008 .

[19]  Judith Hills,et al.  The semantic turn: A new foundation for design , 2008 .

[20]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism: a proposal and framework for a new discipline of hci , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Gavin Melles,et al.  An Enlarged Pragmatist Inquiry Paradigm for Methodological Pluralism in Academic Design Research , 2008 .

[22]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism and aesthetics , 2009, CHI.