Trade, Materials Flows, and Economic Development in the South: The Example of Chile

Materials flow analysis (MFA) is internationally recognized as a key tool to assess the biophysical metabolism of societies and to provide aggregated indicators for environmental pressures of human activities. Economy-wide MFAs have been compiled for a number of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, but so far very few studies exist for countries in the South. In this article, the first materials-flow-based indicators for Chile are presented. The article analyzes the restructuring of the Chilean economy toward an active integration in the world markets from the perspective of natural resource use in a time series from 1973 to 2000. Special emphasis is placed on the assessment of materials flows related to Chile's international trade relations. Results show that material inputs to the Chilean economy increased by a factor of 6, mainly as a result of the promotion of resource-intensive exports from the mining, fruit growing, forestry, and fishery sectors. At more than 40 tons, Chile's resource use per capita at present is one of the highest in the world. The article addresses the main shortcomings of the MFA approach, such as weightbased aggregation and the missing links between environmental pressures and impacts, and gives suggestions for methodological improvements and possible extensions of the MFA framework, with the intent of developing MFA into a more powerful tool for policy use.

[1]  René Kleijn IN = OUT: The Trivial Central Paradigm of MFA? , 1999 .

[2]  T. Selden,et al.  International Trade Intensity and Carbon Emissions: A Cross-Country Econometric Analysis , 2001 .

[3]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment , 1998 .

[4]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Evaluating options in LCA: The emergence of conflicting paradigms for impact assessment and evaluation , 1998 .

[5]  Paul Ekins From Green GNP to the Sustainability Gap: recent Developments in national environmental economic Accounting , 2001 .

[6]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[7]  R. Gwynne Direct Foreign Investment and Non‐traditional Export Growth in Chile: the Case of the Forestry Sector , 1996 .

[8]  Paul Ekins,et al.  The Sustainability Gap: a Practical Indicator of Sustainability in the Framework of the National Accounts , 1999 .

[9]  Beatriz E Castañeda An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Chile , 1999 .

[10]  Xiaoqiu Chen,et al.  A Preliminary Material Input Analysis of China , 2001 .

[11]  L. Reijnders The Factor X Debate: Setting Targets for Eco‐Efficiency , 1998 .

[12]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Society's Metabolism , 1998 .

[13]  C. Reid,et al.  Neo-liberalism and its impact on overfishing and overcapitalisation in the marine fisheries of Chile, Mexico and Peru , 2000 .

[14]  D. Tyteca Sustainability Indicators at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[15]  Joan Martinez-Alier,et al.  Trade and the environment: from a ‘Southern’ perspective , 2001 .

[16]  J. Clapp What the Pollution Havens Debate Overlooks , 2002, Global Environmental Politics.

[17]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  Pollution Havens: An Analysis of Policy Options for Dealing with an Elusive Phenomenon , 2001 .

[18]  R. Schurman Snails, southern hake and sustainability: Neoliberalism and natural resource exports in Chile , 1996 .

[19]  Paul H. Brunner,et al.  Beyond Materials Flow Analysis , 2002 .

[20]  Glenn-Marie Lange Applying an Integrated Natural Resource Accounts and Input–Output Model to Development Planning in Indonesia , 1998 .

[21]  D. Wheeler Beyond Pollution Havens , 2002, Global Environmental Politics.

[22]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Estimating sustainability gaps: methods and preliminary applications for the UK and the Netherlands , 2001 .

[23]  Jan Kovanda,et al.  Material flow accounts, balances and derived indicators for the Czech Republic during the 1990s: results and recommendations for methodological improvements , 2003 .

[24]  Jyri Seppälä,et al.  On the meaning of the distance-to-target weighting method and normalisation in Life Cycle Impact assessment , 2001 .

[25]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Extending the Boundaries of Life‐Cycle Assessment through Environmental Economic Input‐Output Models , 2000 .

[26]  L. Macaskie,et al.  Microbially-enhanced chemisorption of heavy metals : A method for the bioremediation of solutions containing long-lived isotopes of neptunium and plutonium , 1998 .

[27]  Jan van Dalen,et al.  Input-output analysis of material flows with application to iron, steel and zinc , 1997 .

[28]  C. Kolstad,et al.  Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment? , 1998 .

[29]  S. Joshi Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques , 1999 .

[30]  D. A. Tolle,et al.  Evaluating Land-Use Impacts: Selection of Surface Area Metrics for Life-Cycle Assessment of Mining , 2008 .

[31]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  SETAC-Europe: Second working group on LCIA (WIA-2): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment: Background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2) , 1999 .

[32]  Joan Martinez-Alier,et al.  SouthNorth Materials Flow: History and Environmental Repercussions , 2001 .

[33]  M. Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a Vital Factor in Analysing the Environmental Impact of Socio-Economic Metabolism , 2001 .

[34]  S. Bringezu Ressourcennutzung in Wirtschaftsräumen , 2000 .

[35]  M. Altieri,et al.  Ecological Impacts of Chile's Neoliberal Policies, with Special Emphasis on Agroecosystems , 1999 .

[36]  D. Wheeler,et al.  In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960 to 1995 , 1998 .

[37]  Pedro E. Maldonado,et al.  Long term energy-related environmental issues of copper production , 2002 .

[38]  René Kleijn,et al.  Adding It All Up The Sense and Non‐Sense of Bulk‐MFA , 2000 .

[39]  Friedrich Hinterberger,et al.  Material flows vs. 'natural capital': What makes an economy sustainable? , 1997 .

[40]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Environmental Kuznets curves—real progress or passing the buck?: A case for consumption-based approaches , 1998 .