Topology, structures, and energy landscapes of human chromosomes

Significance Various cell types emerge from their nearly identical genetic content for a multicellular organism, in part, via the regulation of the function of the genome—the DNA molecules inside the cell. Similar to the way catalytic activity is lost when proteins denature, the function of the genome is tightly coupled to its 3D organization. A theoretical framework for picturing the structure and dynamics of the genome will therefore greatly advance our understanding of cell biology. We present an energy landscape model of the chromosome that reproduces a diverse set of experimental measurements. The model enables quantitative predictions of chromosome structure and topology and provides mechanistic insight into the role of 3D genome organization in gene regulation and cell differentiation. Chromosome conformation capture experiments provide a rich set of data concerning the spatial organization of the genome. We use these data along with a maximum entropy approach to derive a least-biased effective energy landscape for the chromosome. Simulations of the ensemble of chromosome conformations based on the resulting information theoretic landscape not only accurately reproduce experimental contact probabilities, but also provide a picture of chromosome dynamics and topology. The topology of the simulated chromosomes is probed by computing the distribution of their knot invariants. The simulated chromosome structures are largely free of knots. Topologically associating domains are shown to be crucial for establishing these knotless structures. The simulated chromosome conformations exhibit a tendency to form fibril-like structures like those observed via light microscopy. The topologically associating domains of the interphase chromosome exhibit multistability with varying liquid crystalline ordering that may allow discrete unfolding events and the landscape is locally funneled toward “ideal” chromosome structures that represent hierarchical fibrils of fibrils.

[1]  A Klug,et al.  Solenoidal model for superstructure in chromatin. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Alexander Vologodskii,et al.  REVIEWS OF TOPICAL PROBLEMS: Topological aspects of the physics of polymers: The theory and its biophysical applications , 1981 .

[3]  Thomas A. Weber,et al.  Hidden structure in liquids , 1982 .

[4]  J. Dubochet,et al.  Electron microscopy of the chromosomes of dinoflagellates in situ: confirmation of Bouligand's liquid crystal hypothesis , 1986 .

[5]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[6]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Crumpled globule model of the three-dimensional structure of DNA , 1993 .

[7]  J. Swedlow,et al.  Multiple chromosomal populations of topoisomerase II detected in vivo by time-lapse, three-dimensional wide-field microscopy , 1993, Cell.

[8]  J. Sikorav,et al.  Kinetics of chromosome condensation in the presence of topoisomerases: a phantom chain model. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[9]  H. Stanley,et al.  Statistical physics of macromolecules , 1995 .

[10]  Zaida Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Helix-Coil, Liquid Crystal, and Spin Glass Transitions of a Collapsed Heteropolymer , 1995 .

[11]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[12]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Exploring structures in protein folding funnels with free energy functionals: the denatured ensemble. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Champoux DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[14]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Stochastic gene expression as a many-body problem , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Louise Fairall,et al.  EM measurements define the dimensions of the "30-nm" chromatin fiber: evidence for a compact, interdigitated structure. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  T. Misteli Beyond the Sequence: Cellular Organization of Genome Function , 2011 .

[17]  Ralf Everaers,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Interphase Chromosomes , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes , 2008, Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology.

[19]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Electrostatic effects on funneled landscapes and structural diversity in denatured protein ensembles , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[21]  Alexey Savelyev,et al.  Molecular renormalization group coarse-graining of electrolyte solutions: application to aqueous NaCl and KCl. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[22]  D. Heermann,et al.  Spatially confined folding of chromatin in the interphase nucleus , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  L. Mirny The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell , 2011, Chromosome Research.

[24]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Model of the Yeast Genome , 2010, Nature.

[25]  J. Dekker,et al.  Genomics tools for the unraveling of chromosome architecture , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Dieter W. Heermann,et al.  Diffusion-Driven Looping Provides a Consistent Framework for Chromatin Organization , 2010, PloS one.

[27]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[28]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Communication: Effective temperature and glassy dynamics of active matter. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  A. Fisher,et al.  Chromatin states in pluripotent, differentiated, and reprogrammed cells. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[30]  Marc A Marti-Renom,et al.  The Three-dimensional Architecture of a Bacterial Genome and Its Alteration by Genetic Perturbation , 2022 .

[31]  Achilleas S Frangakis,et al.  Human mitotic chromosomes consist predominantly of irregularly folded nucleosome fibres without a 30‐nm chromatin structure , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[32]  Mario Nicodemi,et al.  Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Architecture of a Bacterial Genome and Its Alteration by Genetic Perturbation , 2012, RECOMB.

[34]  Reza Kalhor,et al.  Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  John D Chodera,et al.  On the Use of Experimental Observations to Bias Simulated Ensembles. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[36]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Dynamical modeling of three-dimensional genome organization in interphase budding yeast. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[38]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Tensegrity and motor-driven effective interactions in a model cytoskeleton. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[39]  Jörg Langowski,et al.  The statistical-mechanics of chromosome conformation capture , 2013, Nucleus.

[40]  Jennifer E. Phillips-Cremins,et al.  Architectural Protein Subclasses Shape 3D Organization of Genomes during Lineage Commitment , 2013, Cell.

[41]  A. Tanay,et al.  Single cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure , 2013, Nature.

[42]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Time Scales in Epigenetic Dynamics and Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  Benoît Roux,et al.  On the statistical equivalence of restrained-ensemble simulations with the maximum entropy method. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[44]  Edith Heard,et al.  Segmental folding of chromosomes: A basis for structural and regulatory chromosomal neighborhoods? , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[45]  Job Dekker,et al.  Organization of the Mitotic Chromosome , 2013, Science.

[46]  V. Corces,et al.  CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[47]  Jie Liang,et al.  Spatial confinement is a major determinant of the folding landscape of human chromosomes , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  J. Dekker,et al.  Predictive Polymer Modeling Reveals Coupled Fluctuations in Chromosome Conformation and Transcription , 2014, Cell.

[49]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Stem cell differentiation as a many-body problem , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Evolution, energy landscapes and the paradoxes of protein folding. , 2015, Biochimie.

[51]  Chris Anderson,et al.  Beyond the Sequence , 2015 .