Effects of blended e-Learning: a case study in higher education tax learning setting

This article has two main objectives. First, we describe the design of an e-learning system for a University Income Tax Law course. Second, we analyze and explore learning results in terms of students’ learning satisfaction and learning achievement. Learning achievement was examined by questions derived from the course content while learning satisfaction was analyzed based on an adaptation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).Results indicate that neither gender nor the school system affect students’ e-learning system satisfaction. Since students’ knowledge and exposure to computers are equal regardless of gender or educational background this reduces the significance of both these variables. Participating samples are divided into three groups: traditional, fully on-line and blended learning. We find, however, a statistically significant difference existed in learning achievement among groups. The blended learning group, combining on- line learning with paper-and-pencil testing, has the best learning achievement among the three groups.

[1]  Antje Baer,et al.  E Learning Strategies For Delivering Knowledge In The Digital Age , 2016 .

[2]  Brigitte Maier,et al.  Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Abdullah N. Al-Mutairi,et al.  Factors Affecting Business Students' Performance in Arab Open University: The Case of Kuwait , 2011 .

[4]  N. Vaughan Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education , 2007 .

[5]  Allan J. Henderson,et al.  The E-Learning Question and Answer Book: A Survival Guide for Trainers and Business Managers , 2002 .

[6]  Peggy A. Hite,et al.  A primer on tax education in the United States of America , 2001 .

[7]  Blythe McVicker Clinchy,et al.  Women s ways of knowing: The development of self , 1988 .

[8]  Juan A. Gómez-Pulido,et al.  Computers and Education: E-learning, From Theory to Practice , 2007 .

[9]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[10]  P. Nicholson A History of E-Learning , 2007 .

[11]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[12]  Scott K. Metlen,et al.  REVIEW OF BUSINESS RESEARCH , 2012 .

[13]  Harvey Singh,et al.  Building Effective Blended Learning Programs , 2021, Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks.

[14]  Dohoon Kim,et al.  Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  N. Ismail International Journal of Business and Management , 2013 .

[16]  Elmarie Engelbrecht,et al.  Adapting to changing expectations: Post-graduate students' experience of an e-learning tax program , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Shalin Hai-Jew,et al.  Washington Online Virtual Campus: Infusing culture in dispersed Web-based higher education , 2004 .

[18]  James J. Cappel,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study , 2006, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[19]  John Cotton,et al.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. 6th ed. , 1978 .

[20]  Milan Taradi,et al.  Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. , 2005, Advances in physiology education.

[21]  A. P. Rovai,et al.  Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses , 2004 .

[22]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Teaching with Technology , 2011 .

[23]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  A. Lymer,et al.  Tax education in the UK: a survey of tax courses in undergraduate accounting degrees , 1999 .

[25]  Miguel Ángel Montero Alonso,et al.  Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Marjan Hericko,et al.  An empirical examination of application frameworks success based on technology acceptance model , 2010, J. Syst. Softw..

[28]  Doo Hun Lim,et al.  Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within a Blended Learning Environment , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  J. Guilford Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .