Internet TV Broadcast: What Next?

The use of broadcast TV channels is growing considerably so that the number of users (scalability) and the need to manage traffic (bandwidth) are challenges for network design and dimensioning. Broadcast and live channels show strict requirements to operate on a continuous basis in content distribution scenarios in terms of delay, huge demand of bandwidth and characterized by very dynamic variations. There arises the need for more efficient applications and network solutions to meet expectations in quality and number of users and, at the same time, make feasible a high degree of penetration of services taken into account that ISPs and network operators infrastructures are increasingly saturated. This paper discusses the existing solutions to distribute video broadcast and describes new emerging concepts from the standpoint of efficient use of bandwidth and network traffic in the Internet environment. Theoretical solutions are proposed at various levels, from application to network, such as the introduction of location in peer-to-peer overlay networks, active provider P2P architecture or P4P which combines peer to-peer technology with information from the network topology and inter-domain multicast.

[1]  Bo Li,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Internet Video Broadcast , 2008, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Stephen E. Deering,et al.  Host extensions for IP multicasting , 1986, RFC.

[3]  David Thaler,et al.  Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification , 1997, RFC.

[4]  Gerard O'Driscoll Next Generation IPTV Services and Technologies , 2008 .

[5]  Jarmo Harju,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Streaming Technology Survey , 2008, Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008).

[6]  Gaurav Agrawal,et al.  The global multicast routing protocol - a new architecture for hierarchical multicast routing , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[7]  V. Freitas,et al.  A new path probing strategy for inter-domain multicast routing , 2005, Next Generation Internet Networks, 2005.

[8]  Brian Haberman,et al.  Embedding the Rendezvous Point (RP) Address in an IPv6 Multicast Address , 2004, RFC.

[9]  Mark Handley,et al.  Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification , 1997, RFC.

[10]  Osamu Takahashi,et al.  Domain Constrained Multicast: A New Approach for IP Multicast Routing , 2004, Telecommun. Syst..

[11]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  IP Multicast Applications: Challenges and Solutions , 2001, RFC.

[12]  Arvind Krishnamurthy,et al.  P 4 P : Explicit Communications for Cooperative Control Between P 2 P and Network Providers , 2007 .

[13]  Pekka Savola,et al.  Overview of the Internet Multicast Routing Architecture , 2008, RFC.

[14]  Nasser Yazdani,et al.  Next Branch Multicast (NBM) routing protocol , 2005, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  IPTV over P2P streaming networks: the mesh-pull approach , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  A Measurement Study of a Large-Scale P2P IPTV System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[17]  Stephen E. Deering,et al.  Multicast routing in datagram internetworks and extended LANs , 1990, TOCS.