Energy Co‐Operation in the Wider Europe: Institutionalizing Interdependence

The EU's response to concerns about energy security is to diversify sources of supply and delivery routes. To this end it seeks to engage potential energy partners across the wider Europe in an institutionalized regime based on the norms of the internal market. This article uses regime theory to evaluate the viability of the strategy. From this perspective, the willingness of the EU's partners to make commitments to institutionalized co-operation will depend on two sets of variables: their interests in resolving the co-operation problems that arise across the energy supply chain; and the ‘pull’ of the EU in relation to countervailing hegemonic powers in the region. The research tests this argument by examining the co-operation interests of energy consumers, transit countries and producers, and the architecture of emerging institutions in the respective regional contexts. It finds that while energy consumers and transit countries in the EU's immediate neighbourhood are prepared to commit to binding multilateral institutions, co-operation with energy producers is constrained by asymmetries of interest and regional geopolitics, and is likely to take the form of more flexible bilateral agreements.

[1]  I. Rohlfing,et al.  The Political Economy of Bilateralism and Multilateralism: Institutional Choice in International Trade and Taxation , 2005 .

[2]  S. Lavenex A governance perspective on the European neighbourhood policy: integration beyond conditionality? , 2008 .

[3]  Susan Strange Cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis , 1982, International Organization.

[4]  Sanam Salem Haghighi,et al.  Energy Security: The External Legal Relations of the European Union with Major Oil and Gas Supplying Countries , 2007 .

[5]  Richard. Youngs Energy Security: Europe's New Foreign Policy Challenge , 2009 .

[6]  Ever Meulen Gas Supply and EU–Russia Relations , 2009 .

[7]  Aad Correljé,et al.  Energy supply security and geopolitics: A European perspective , 2006 .

[8]  C. Locatelli Relations UE-Russie : Les enjeux d'une nouvelle architecture gazière , 2012 .

[9]  Hakim Darbouche Russian-Algerian Cooperation and the 'Gas OPEC': What's in the Pipeline? , 2007 .

[10]  J. Ruggie Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution , 1992, International Organization.

[11]  Richard. Youngs,et al.  Europe's External Energy Policy: Between Geopolitics and the Market , 2007 .

[12]  Ulrich Sedelmeier,et al.  Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe , 2004 .

[13]  Hakim Darbouche Decoding Algeria's ENP Policy: Differentiation by Other Means? , 2008 .

[14]  Duncan Snidal,et al.  The Rational Design of International Institutions , 2001, International Organization.

[15]  S. Lavenex EU external governance in 'wider Europe' , 2004 .

[16]  Lisa L. Martin Interests, power, and multilateralism , 1992, International Organization.

[17]  Environmental Programme,et al.  Competition and Liberalization in European Gas Markets: A Diversity of Models , 1998 .