Memory for actions in scripted activities as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task

This study examined memory for information that varies in typicality (relevance) to a central organizing schema. Subjects listened to scripted activities and were given recall and recognition tests after different retention intervals. Data supported a schema-pointer-plus-tag model that specifies how memory for scripted actions varies as a function of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task. Several mathematical formulations of the model were tested in order to simulate the recall and recognition data. The model that best fit the data incorporated four properties. First, memory discrimination is initially better for atypical than for typical actions in both recall and recognition tasks. Second, recall involves conceptually driven retrieval, whereas recognition involves both conceptually driven and data-driven retrieval. Third, conceptually driven retrieval has an exponentially decreasing retention function, whereas there is a linear decrease in data-driven retrieval. Fourth, the retention function for conceptually driven retrieval is steeper for atypical than for typical actions, which supports the notion that the schema plays a more important role in guiding this type of retrieval as the retention interval increases; in contrast, the slopes of the retention functions for data-driven retrieval are the same for typical and atypical actions. A schema-pointer-plus-tag model was compared with some alternative schema-based memory models.

[1]  R. Woodworth Dynamics of behavior , 1958 .

[2]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[3]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[4]  R. D'Andrade Memory and the Assessment of Behavior , 1974 .

[5]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[6]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[7]  G. Mandler,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[9]  John Brown,et al.  Recall and Recognition , 1976 .

[10]  George Mandler,et al.  Determinants of recognition and recall: Accessibility and generation , 1977 .

[11]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[12]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[13]  W. Mischel,et al.  Prototypicality and personality: Effects on free recall and personality impressions , 1979 .

[14]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Descriptions: An intermediate stage in memory retrieval , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: Tests of a script pointer + tag hypothesis , 1979 .

[16]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[19]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The processing of social stimulus information: A conceptual integration , 1980 .

[20]  A. Graesser,et al.  Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. , 1980 .

[21]  A. Graesser Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word , 1981 .

[22]  Claudia E. Cohen,et al.  Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effect of prior knowledge. , 1981 .