[Normal nasalance for the German language. Nasometric values for clinical use in patients with cleft lip and palate].

OBJECTIVE Rhinophonia is often present in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) many years after palatoplasty. It may be caused either by organic deficits, functional disorders, or both. NasalView is known as an instrument for the objective assessment of nasalance in cases of velopharyngeal insufficiency or incompetence.However,normative values for the German language are not yet available. In order to overcome this problem, this study evaluated such norms using NasalView. METHODS A total of 50 individuals with normal speech development were examined with NasalView. The median age was 14 years (range 11-20 years). The tone material used comprised the vowels /a:/, /e:/, /i:/, /o:/, /u:/, the sentences S(1): "Die Schokolade ist sehr lecker."("This chocolate is very tasty.") and S(2): "Nenne meine Mamma Mimmi."("Call my mummy Mimmi."), and the text passages of LT(1): "Nordwind und Sonne"("Northwind and sun"), LT(2): "Kindergeburtstag"("A child's birthday party") and LT(3): "Der grosse Gesang"("A famous song"). RESULTS The mean nasalance for the vowels was 35.9% (+/-8.4), for S(1) (containing no nasal consonants) 24.9% (+/-5.3), and for S(2) 69.6% (+/-5.5) (with many nasal sounds). The results for the text passages were 42.1% (+/-4.2) for LT(1), 36.9% (+/-4.3) for LT(2) and 38.2% (+/-4.4) for LT(3). CONCLUSION The norms of nasalance for the German language presented here may be useful in measuring the long-term outcome of cleft lip and palate.

[1]  R. Müller,et al.  Objektive Messung der normalen Nasalanz im sächsischen Sprachraum , 2000, HNO.

[2]  R. Malek,et al.  Nouvelle conception de la chronologie et de la technique chirurgicale du traitement des fentes labio-palatines: résultats sur 220 cas , 1983 .

[3]  W. Heppt,et al.  Das Nasometer Ein Instrument zur Objektivierung der Hyperrhinophonie bei LKG-Patienten , 1994, Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[4]  R. Schmelzeisen,et al.  Long-term results following velopharyngoplasty with a cranially based pharyngeal flap. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  R. Dalston,et al.  Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross-dialect and cross-culture study. , 1993, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[6]  S G Fletcher,et al.  Theory and instrumentation for quantitative measurement of nasality. , 1970, The Cleft palate journal.

[7]  R. Dalston,et al.  Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. , 1991, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[8]  W. Heppt,et al.  [Nasalance: a new concept for objective analysis of nasality]. , 1991, Laryngo- rhino- otologie.

[9]  R. Sader,et al.  Nasalance distance and ratio: two new measures. , 2000, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[10]  W. B. Arndt,et al.  The relationship between nasality score values and oral and nasal sound pressure level. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  M Ptok,et al.  A retrospective study of hearing, speech and language function in children with clefts following palatoplasty and veloplasty procedures at 18-24 months of age. , 1999, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[12]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Ten-Year Follow-up of Simultaneous Repair of Cleft Lip and Palate in Infancy , 1982, Annals of plastic surgery.