Bonding and Debonding From Metal to Ceramic: Research and its Clinical Application

Over the last 50 years, the bonding of various resins to enamel has also developed a niche in orthodontics. The direct bonding technique revolves around the concept of attaching orthodontic appliances to tooth structure using adhesives, and this technique has become a foundation of contemporary orthodontics. Although the specific techniques and materials used in bracket bonding have changed, the basic procedure has remained relatively constant. In general, the technique for orthodontic bonding includes 3 steps using an etchant, a primer, and an adhesive. More recently, these 3 steps have been combined into 2 or even 1 step. At the present time, numerous bonding materials, techniques, and protocols have been established that have the ability to provide the clinician with adequate bracket/adhesive/enamel (shear bond strength [SBS]), over the course of treatment. However, bracket SBS is influenced by many variables which may or may not be under the control of the clinician. It is important for the clinician to be aware of how these variables affect SBS and apply this knowledge in their selection of the optimal bonding adhesive/technique. In addition, because of the lack of standardization of bond strength testing, the clinician should be cognizant that accurately comparing bond strengths between different studies may be difficult.

[1]  I. Ceja,et al.  Enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching: an in vitro study. , 2008, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[2]  J. Warren,et al.  Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  J. Warren,et al.  A self-conditioner for resin-modified glass ionomers in bonding orthodontic brackets. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  M. Swartz Limitations of in vitro orthodontic bond strength testing. , 2007, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[5]  Serdar Sezen,et al.  Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets bonded with a protective liquid polish and a light-cured adhesive. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  S. Khier,et al.  In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  J. Warren,et al.  Shear bond strength comparison of two adhesive systems following thermocycling. A new self-etch primer and a resin-modified glass ionomer. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  Raed Ajlouni,et al.  Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets. , 2007, World journal of orthodontics.

[9]  L. A. Bravo,et al.  Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of brackets bonded with a compomer. , 2006, American journal of dentistry.

[10]  Theodore Eliades,et al.  Orthodontic materials research and applications: part 1. Current status and projected future developments in bonding and adhesives. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  J. Warren,et al.  Early shear bond strength of a one-step self-adhesive on orthodontic brackets. , 2006, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  T. Eliades,et al.  Orthodontic Materials Scientific And Clinical Aspects , 2006 .

[13]  J. Warren,et al.  Comparison of shear bond strength of two self-etch primer/adhesive systems. , 2006, The Angle orthodontist.

[14]  J. Warren,et al.  The use of Ormocer as an alternative material for bonding orthodontic brackets. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  D. Shieh,et al.  Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  S. Bishara,et al.  The effect of tooth bleaching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  L. A. Bravo,et al.  Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primers. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[18]  E. Gunel,et al.  Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  T. Eliades,et al.  Risk Management in Orthodontics: Experts' Guide to Malpractice , 2004 .

[20]  S. Bishara,et al.  Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self-etch primer/adhesive systems. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of water storage on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate adhesive: clinical implications. , 2004, World journal of orthodontics.

[23]  K. Titley,et al.  Glass ionomer cements as luting agents for orthodontic brackets. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[24]  S. Bishara,et al.  The effect of blood contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with the use of a new self-etch primer. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  S. Bishara,et al.  The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets when using a self-etch primer. , 2002, The Angle orthodontist.

[27]  J. Warren,et al.  Effect of time on the shear bond strength of cyanoacrylate and composite orthodontic adhesives. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  J. Warren,et al.  Evaluation of nonrinse conditioning solution and a compomer as an alternative method of bonding orthodontic bracket. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[29]  J. Warren,et al.  Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[30]  F. Tay,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[31]  J. Warren,et al.  Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[32]  A. Mamandras,et al.  Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[33]  J. Newell,et al.  A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[34]  N. Altay,et al.  Effects of a nonrinse conditioner and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the etch pattern of intact human permanent enamel. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[35]  D C Watts,et al.  Optimal specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strain measurements on light-cured biomaterials. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[36]  E. Combe,et al.  Contemporary resin-based composite materials for direct placement restorations: packables, flowables and others. , 2000, Dental update.

[37]  S. Arici,et al.  The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study. , 2000, European journal of orthodontics.

[38]  T Eliades,et al.  The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. , 2000, European journal of orthodontics.

[39]  D. Millett,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[40]  P. L. Sadowsky,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[41]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[42]  K. Gökçe,et al.  In vitro shear bond strength of adhesive to normal and fluoridated enamel under various contaminated conditions. , 1999, Quintessence international.

[43]  Z. Cehreli,et al.  Effect of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of compomers to human primary and permanent enamel. , 1999, American journal of dentistry.

[44]  R. Hickel,et al.  [New direct restorative materials]. , 1998, Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde.

[45]  S. Bishara,et al.  Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[46]  W. Sperr,et al.  Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements. , 1998, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[47]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of an acidic primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[48]  D. Pashley,et al.  Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. , 1998, Operative dentistry.

[49]  A. Kakaboura,et al.  Acid-base reaction and fluoride release profiles in visible light-cured polyacid-modified composite restoratives (compomers). , 1998, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[50]  S. Bishara,et al.  Evaluation of Scotchbond Multipurpose and maleic acid as alternative methods of bonding orthodontic brackets. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[51]  J. Årtun A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.

[52]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  Evaluation of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. , 1997, The Angle orthodontist.

[53]  J. Summitt,et al.  Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach , 1996 .

[54]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[55]  L. Mancl,et al.  A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1996, The Angle orthodontist.

[56]  E. Silverman,et al.  A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[57]  S E Bishara,et al.  The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[58]  J. Miguel,et al.  Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[59]  E. Swift,et al.  Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[60]  L. Forsten Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and uptake. , 1995, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[61]  L. Forsten Fluoride release of glass ionomers. , 1994, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[62]  J W McLean,et al.  Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. , 1994, Quintessence international.

[63]  W. Wiltshire Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[64]  J. Fricker A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[65]  S. Twetman,et al.  L(+)-Lactic Acid Production in Plaque from Orthodontic Appliances Retained with Glass Ionomer Cement , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.

[66]  J F McCabe,et al.  A Critique of Bond Strength Testing in Orthodontics , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.

[67]  E. Swift,et al.  Effects of etching time on enamel bond strengths. , 1993, American journal of dentistry.

[68]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of enamel bleaching on the bonding strength of orthodontic brackets. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[69]  J. Powers,et al.  In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[70]  H. Forss Release of Fluoride and Other Elements from Light-cured Glass lonomers in Neutral and Acidic Conditions , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[71]  S. Bishara,et al.  A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[72]  P. Rossouw,et al.  Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[73]  L. Winchester Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. , 1991, European journal of orthodontics.

[74]  R. L. Cooley,et al.  Bond strength of light-cure fluoride-releasing base-liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[75]  A. Caputo,et al.  Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems. , 1991, The Angle orthodontist.

[76]  J C Gunsolley,et al.  Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[77]  W. Ledoux,et al.  Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[78]  S E Bishara,et al.  Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[79]  S E Bishara,et al.  Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[80]  R. Nanda,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[81]  V. P. Joseph,et al.  The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[82]  R. L. Cooley,et al.  Fluoride release from fluoride-containing liners/bases. , 1990, Quintessence international.

[83]  E. Davis,et al.  Bond strength and durability of glass ionomer cements used as bonding agents in the placement of orthodontic brackets. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[84]  Swift Ej Effects of glass ionomers on recurrent caries. , 1989 .

[85]  R. Kusy Morphology of polycrystalline alumina brackets and its relationship to fracture toughness and strength. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[86]  C. Youngson,et al.  An in vitro Study of the Bond Strength of a Glass Ionomer Cement in the Direct Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets , 1988, British journal of orthodontics.

[87]  H. G. Hershey The orthodontic appliance: esthetic considerations. , 1988, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[88]  J. Arends,et al.  Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[89]  G. E. Scott Fracture toughness and surface cracks--the key to understanding ceramic brackets. , 1988, The Angle orthodontist.

[90]  A. Williams,et al.  Bonding Class II composite to etched glass ionomer cement , 1987, British Dental Journal.

[91]  J. V. Dijken,et al.  In vivo adaptation of restorative materials to dentin. , 1986 .

[92]  C. B. Jenkins,et al.  An evaluation of the bonding of glass-ionomer restoratives to dentine and enamel , 1986, British Dental Journal.

[93]  Alan D. Wilson,et al.  The release of fluoride and other chemical species from a glass-ionomer cement. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[94]  L. Silverstone,et al.  Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: an SEM study. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[95]  A. Gwinnett,et al.  Effects of enamel etching time on bond strength and morphology. , 1985, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[96]  S. Newman,et al.  Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silane. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[97]  H. J. Prosser,et al.  Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 7. The physical properties of current materials. , 1984, E -journal of dentistry.

[98]  J Artun,et al.  Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[99]  F. Gillespie,et al.  The effect of salivary contamination on fissure sealant--enamel bond strength. , 1981, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[100]  J. Salzmann A new method for direct bonding orthodontic attachments to porcelain teeth using a silane coupling agent: An in vitro evaluation , 1980 .

[101]  D. Beech,et al.  Bonding of Polymers to Enamel: Influence of Deposits Formed During Etching, Etching Time and Period of Water Immersion , 1980, Journal of dental research.

[102]  G. Denehy,et al.  Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. , 1980, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[103]  A J Gwinnett,et al.  Plaque distribution on bonded brackets: a scanning microscope study. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[104]  I. Kleinberg,et al.  Effect of orthodontic band placement on the chemical composition of human incisor tooth plaque. , 1979, Archives of oral biology.

[105]  J. Mclean,et al.  The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates , 1977, British Dental Journal.

[106]  I. Reynolds A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding , 1975 .

[107]  N. A. Wickwire,et al.  Enamel pretreatment: a critical variable in direct bonding systems. , 1973, American journal of orthodontics.

[108]  A. D. Wilson,et al.  The properties of a glass ionomer cement , 1973, British Dental Journal.

[109]  D. Smith,et al.  Crystalline Interface Formed by Polyacrylic Acid and Tooth Enamel , 1973, Journal of dental research.

[110]  G. V. Newman Adhesion and orthodontic plastic attachments. , 1969, American journal of orthodontics.

[111]  Smith Dc A new dental cement. , 1968, Australian dental journal.

[112]  A. Gwinnett,et al.  Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. , 1968, Archives of oral biology.

[113]  A. Gwinnett,et al.  A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. , 1967, Archives of oral biology.

[114]  A. Gwinnett,et al.  ADHESIVES AND CARIES PREVENTION; A PRELIMINARY REPORT. , 1965, British dental journal.

[115]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.