Misinformation in the loop: the emergence ofnarratives in Online Social Networks

The interlink between information and belief formation and revision is a fundamental aspect of social dynamics. The growth of knowledge fostered by a hyper-connected world together with the unprecedented acceleration of scientific progress has exposed individuals, governments and countries to an increasing level of complexity to explain reality and its phenomena. Despite the enthusiastic rhetoric about the so called collective intelligence, conspiracy theories and other unsubstantiated claims find on the Web a natural medium for their diffusion. Cases in which these kinds of false information are used in political debates are far from unimaginable. In this work, we study the behavior of users supporting different (and opposite) worldviews – i.e. scientific and conspiracist thinking – that commented the posts of the Facebook page of a large italian political party that advocates direct democracy and e-Participation. We find that users supporting different narratives consume political information in a similar way. Moreover, by analyzing the composition of users active on the page in terms of commenting activity, we notice that almost one fifth of them is represented by polarized consumers of conspiracy stories, and those are able to generate almost one third of total comments to the posts of the page

[1]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  New Media, Micromobilization, and Political Agenda Setting: Crossover Effects in Political Mobilization and Media Usage , 2011, Inf. Soc..

[2]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[3]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Rony Medaglia,et al.  Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government , 2007, Inf. Polity.

[5]  Kevin Lewis,et al.  Social selection and peer influence in an online social network , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[7]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[8]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  eParticipation: The Research Gaps , 2009, ePart.

[9]  D. Boyd,et al.  The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions , 2011 .

[10]  Torsten Eymann,et al.  Social knowledge for eGovernance: Theory and technology of reputation , 2009 .

[11]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[12]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online , 2000 .

[13]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[14]  C. Sunstein,et al.  Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures* , 2009 .

[15]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions , 2013, CSCW.

[16]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Elena Sánchez-Nielsen,et al.  eParticipation in Practice in Europe: The Case of "Puzzled by Policy: Helping You Be Part of EU" , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Dalia Štreimikienė,et al.  World Economic Forum 2012 , 2012 .

[19]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Analysis of large-scale social and information networks , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Douglas Kellner,et al.  New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging , 2004, New Media Soc..

[22]  Henry L Roediger,et al.  Explorations in the social contagion of memory , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  On the effects of informational cheating on social evaluations: image and reputation through gossip , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[24]  Timoteo Carletti,et al.  How to make an efficient propaganda , 2006 .

[25]  Walter Quattrociocchi,et al.  Opinions Manipulation: Media, Power and Gossip , 2011, Adv. Complex Syst..

[26]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Truthy: enabling the study of online social networks , 2012, CSCW '13.

[27]  D. Helbing,et al.  Towards a global participatory platform , 2012, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[28]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Collective attention in the age of (mis)information , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Mark Klein,et al.  Harnessing Collective Intelligence to Address Global Climate Change , 2007, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[30]  Pierre Lévy,et al.  Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace , 1997 .

[31]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Signed networks in social media , 2010, CHI.