Collection/Item Metadata Relationships

Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagations, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.

[1]  Susan A. J. Stuart,et al.  What is a collection , 2004 .

[2]  Tonyia J. Tidline,et al.  Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment , 2001 .

[3]  Jenn Riley,et al.  Semantics and syntax of dublin core usage in open archives initiative data providers of cultural heritage materials , 2005, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '05).

[4]  Les Gasser,et al.  Metadata Quality For Federated Collections , 2004, ICIQ.

[5]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Sustaining Collection Value: Managing Collection/Item Metadata Relationships , 2008 .

[6]  Lorcan Dempsey.  From metasearch to distributed information environments , 2005 .

[7]  Herbert Van de Sompel,et al.  Erratum to: Pathways: augmenting interoperability across scholarly repositories , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[8]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Is 'Quality' Metadata 'Shareable' Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practice on Federated Collections , 2005 .

[9]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  An Overview of OntoClean , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[10]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Logical Models in Information Retrieval: Introduction and Overview , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  Thomas G. Habing.  The Distributed Library: OAI for Digital Library Aggregation -- UIUC's Role: Registry of OAI Data Providers , 2005 .

[12]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  Trends in ... a Critical Review: On the Role of Logic in Information Retrieval , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  Michael Heaney.  An Analytical Model of Collections and their Catalogues , 1999 .

[14]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Collection Definition in Federated Digital Resource Development , 2007, ASIST.

[15]  Hur-Li Lee,et al.  The Concept of Collection from the User’s Perspective , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[16]  David Dubin,et al.  The return of the trivial: problems formalizing collection/item metadata relationships , 2008, JCDL.

[17]  Sandra Payette,et al.  Pathways: augmenting interoperability across scholarly repositories , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[18]  Ronald J. Brachman,et al.  What IS-A Is and Isn't: An Analysis of Taxonomic Links in Semantic Networks , 1983, Computer.

[19]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  A case study in metadata harvesting: the NSDL , 2003 .

[20]  William A. Woods,et al.  What's in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks , 1975 .

[21]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  A framework for information quality assessment , 2007 .

[22]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  Living wiht Classic: When and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language , 1991, Principles of Semantic Networks.

[23]  Hur-Li Lee,et al.  What is a collection , 2000 .

[24]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  A Non-Classical Logic for Information Retrieval , 1997, Comput. J..

[25]  J. Ritchie.  Where is the—Collection? , 1940, Nature.

[26]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Metadata practices and implications for federated collections , 2005, ASIST.

[27]  C. Palmer.  Thematic Research Collections , 2007 .

[28]  Diane Hillmann,et al.  Analyzing Metadata for Effective Use and Re-Use , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[29]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  Metadata aggregation and "automated digital libraries": a retrospective on the NSDL experience , 2006, Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '06).

[30]  Timothy W. Cole,et al.  Using collection descriptions to enhance an aggregation of harvested item-level metadata , 2005, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '05).