Efficient otoacoustic emission protocols employed in a hospital-based neonatal screening program.

Within the context of a hospital-based newborn hearing screening program, we have studied the application of two OAE protocols (TEOAE and DPOAE) on a group of 250 well babies. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of DPOAE protocol in a relatively large population sample. using a preset number of five tested frequencies, in comparison with a default TEOAE screening protocol. The data were collected on the second day of life and during spontaneous sleep. The TEOAE recordings were acquired with linear protocols using click stimuli of 70-75 dB SPL and were used as indicators of normal cochlear function. The cubic distortion product DPOAE responses were evoked by an asymmetrical 75-65 dB SPL protocol, with a frequency ratio of 1.22. Five frequencies (referring to F2) were tested at 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 kHz. The data from the DPOAE responses show a similar pass rate (similarity = 0.98) to the linear TEOAE protocol. The data presented suggest that a DPOAE cochlear evaluation, at 5 pre-selected frequencies, has clinical potential.

[1]  A. Martini,et al.  Comparison of Neonatal Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Responses Recorded with Linear and QuickScreen Protocols , 2000, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[2]  S Hatzopoulos,et al.  Optimization of TEOAE recording protocols: A linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis: a pilot study on neonatal subjects , 2000, Scandinavian audiology.

[3]  J. Petruccelli,et al.  A TEOAE screening protocol based on linear click stimuli: performance and scoring criteria. , 1999, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  M. P. Moeller,et al.  Treatment efficacy: hearing loss in children. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  J. Mason,et al.  Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[6]  S. Neely,et al.  From Laboratory to Clinic: A Large Scale Study of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Ears with Normal Hearing and Ears with Hearing Loss , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[7]  C. Abdala Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  B. Vohr,et al.  Screening infants for hearing impairment. , 1996, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  V. Das,et al.  Aetiology of bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment in children: a 10 year study. , 1996, Archives of disease in childhood.

[10]  B. Vohr,et al.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emission-based screening in typical nurseries: a response to Jacobson and Jacobson. , 1995, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[11]  C. Yoshinaga-Itano Efficacy of Early Identification and Early Intervention , 1995 .

[12]  J. Marco,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns: normative data. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  J. Smurzyński Longitudinal Measurements of Distortion‐Product and Click‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions of Preterm Infants: Preliminary Results , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[14]  T. Behrens,et al.  Historical, Political, and Technological Context Associated with Early Identification of Hearing Loss , 1993 .

[15]  A. Maxon,et al.  Intervention Issues Created by Successful Universal Newborn Hearing Screening , 1993 .

[16]  D A Nelson,et al.  Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures , 1987, Hearing Research.

[18]  A. Parving Aetiological diagnosis in hearing-impaired children--clinical value and application of a modern examination programme. , 1984, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[19]  David T. Kemp,et al.  Suppressibility of the 2 f 1- f 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man , 1984, Hearing Research.

[20]  R. Ruben,et al.  Plasticity of the Developing Auditory System , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.