A comparison of empirical models used to infer the willingness to pay in contingent valuation

The essence of the contingent valuation method consists of creating a hypothetical market where respondents are asked about their willingness to pay (WTP) for a non-market good. Different empirical models can be formulated to estimate the expected WTP of a sample of respondents and, then, through aggregation, the social valuation of the good is inferred.This paper outlines the relevance of the distributional assumptions when estimating mean WTP. Several parametric and non-parametric methods are discussed and applied to calculate the existence value of a natural space. Results show that WTP is extremely sensitive to the empirical model used.

[1]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions , 1997 .

[2]  G. Garrod,et al.  Modelling zero values and protest responses in contingent valuation surveys , 2003 .

[3]  Joseph C. Cooper.  Flexible Functional Form Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Dichotomous Choice Data , 2002 .

[4]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. , 1990 .

[5]  Clifford S. Russell,et al.  Willingness to Pay : Referendum Contingent Valuation and Uncertain Project Benefits , 1999 .

[6]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Referendum Models and Economic Values: Theoretical, Intuitive, and Practical Bounds on Willingness to Pay , 1998 .

[7]  H. D. Brunk,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION FOR SAMPLING WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION , 1955 .

[8]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models , 1992 .

[9]  Bente Halvorsen,et al.  Differences between Willingness-to-Pay Estimates from Open-Ended and Discrete-Choice Contingent Valuation Methods: The Effects of Heteroscedasticity , 1998 .

[10]  D. Mcleod,et al.  Willingness-to-Pay Estimates Using the Double-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation Format: A Test for Validity and Precision in a Bayesian Framework , 1999 .

[11]  A. Murphy,et al.  Modelling Winners and Losers in Contingent Valuation of Public Goods: Appropriate Welfare Measures and Econometric Analysis , 2001 .

[12]  Daniel A. Gerlowski,et al.  Estimating Existence Value for Users and Nonusers of New Jersey Beaches , 1992 .

[13]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE-RESPONSE CV DATA , 1996 .

[14]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .