A geochemical perspective and assessment of leakage potential for a mature carbon dioxide–enhanced oil recovery project and as a prototype for carbon dioxide sequestration; Rangely field, Colorado

Measurements of CO2 and CH4 soil gas concentrations and gas exchange with the atmosphere at a large-scale CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operation at Rangely, Colorado, United States allowed assessment of the microseepage potential. Shallow and deep soil gas concentrations and direct transport of CO2 and CH4, complemented by carbon isotopes, have demonstrated an estimated microseepage rate to the atmosphere of approximately 400 t CH4/yr from the 78-km2 area of the Rangely field. Preliminary estimates of deep-sourced CO2 losses are in the range of 170 to less than 3800 t/yr. Several holes as much as 9 m deep for nested sampling of gas composition, stable carbon isotopic ratios for CO2 and CH4, and carbon-14 measurements on CO2 indicate that deep-sourced CO2 microseepage loss was detected. Methanotrophic oxidation of microseeping CH4 to CO2 in soils demonstrates significant contribution to soil gas CO2 in high CH4 flux areas, necessitating a revision of the estimated direct CO2 microseepage rate to less than 170 t/yr over the Rangely field.An evaluation of produced water quality from pre-CO2-EOR to 1999 demonstrates an increase in some parameters, particularly of Ca2+ and HCO3, indicating dissolution of ferroan calcite and ferroan dolomite in the Weber Formation. Inverse computer modeling suggested carbonate mineral sequestration was possible within the constraints of evolution of produced water quality. X-ray analyses of well scales, however, do not support the presence of significant mineral sequestration. Instead, modeling indicates that the bulk of the CO2 that has been injected since 1986 is sequestered as dissolved CO2.

[1]  Ragnhild Korbol,et al.  Sleipner vest CO2 disposal - injection of removed CO2 into the Utsira formation , 1995 .

[2]  R W Klusman,et al.  Seasonal Variability in CH4 Emissions from a Landfill in a Cool, Semiarid Climate , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  Joseph N. Moore,et al.  Potential for surface gas flux measurements in exploration and surface evaluation of geothermal resources , 2000 .

[4]  K. Bowker,et al.  Selection and Application of BaSO4 Scale Inhibitors for a CO2 Flood, Rangely Weber Sand Unit, Colorado , 1991 .

[5]  R. Klusman,et al.  Potential for use of gas flux measurements in surface exploration for geothermal resources , 1996 .

[6]  S. Bachu Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: road map for site selection using the transform of the geological space into the CO2 phase space , 2002 .

[7]  William D. Gunter,et al.  Sedimentary basins and greenhouse gases: a serendipitous association , 1999 .

[8]  L.G.H. van der Meer,et al.  The conditions limiting CO2 storage in aquifers , 1993 .

[9]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery , 1993 .

[10]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Aquifer disposal of CO2: Hydrodynamic and mineral trapping , 1994 .

[11]  R. Klusman,et al.  Seasonal variation in methane fluxes from sedimentary basins to the atmosphere: Results from chamber measurements and modeling of transport from deep sources , 2000 .

[12]  R. Klusman,et al.  Evaluation of leakage potential from a carbon dioxide EOR/sequestration project , 2003 .

[13]  R. Klusman,et al.  Natural microseepage of methane to the atmosphere from the Denver‐Julesburg basin, Colorado , 1998 .

[14]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change , 2000 .

[15]  K. Bowker,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Injection and Resultant Alteration of the Weber Sandstone, Rangely Field, Colorado (1) , 1991 .