Selection and maintenance of stimulus–response rules during preparation and performance of a spatial choice-reaction task

The ability to select an appropriate response among competing alternatives is a fundamental requirement for successful performance of a variety of everyday tasks. Recent research suggests that a frontal-parietal network of brain regions (including dorsal prefrontal, dorsal premotor and superior parietal cortices) mediate response selection for spatial material. Most of this research has used blocked experimental designs. Thus, the frontal-parietal activity reported may be due either to tonic activity across a block or to processing occurring at the trial level. Our current event-related fMRI study investigated response selection at the level of the trial in order to identify possible response selection sub-processes. In the study, participants responded to a visually presented stimulus with either a spatially compatible or incompatible manual response. On some trials, several seconds prior to stimulus onset, a cue indicated which task was to be performed. In this way we could identify separate brain regions for task preparation and task performance, if they exist. Our results showed that the frontal-parietal network for spatial response selection activated both during task preparation as well as during task performance. We found no evidence for preparation specific brain mechanisms in this task. These data suggest that spatial response selection and response preparation processes rely on the same neurocognitive mechanisms.

[1]  M. Inase,et al.  Neuronal activity in the primate premotor, supplementary, and precentral motor cortex during visually guided and internally determined sequential movements. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[3]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural Evidence for Representation-Specific Response Selection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  M. Brass,et al.  Advance preparation and stimulus-induced interference in cued task switching: further insights from BOLD fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[8]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Paul B. Johnson,et al.  Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Dual pathways connecting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with the hippocampal formation and parahippocampal cortex in the rhesus monkey , 1984, Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Brass,et al.  Decomposing Components of Task Preparation with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Eric H. Schumacher,et al.  Sustained involvement of a frontal–parietal network for spatial response selection with practice of a spatial choice–reaction task , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  J. Ashe,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus–Response Compatibility on Cortical Motor Activation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[18]  J. Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex—An Update Time Is of the Essence , 2001, Neuron.

[19]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus–response compatibility on brain activation , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[20]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Jumping the gun: is effective preparation contingent upon anticipatory activation in task-relevant neural circuitry? , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Carol L. Colby,et al.  Stimulus–Response Incompatibility Activates Cortex Proximate to Three Eye Fields , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[24]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[26]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[27]  M Eimer,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI I. The Method , 2001, NeuroImage.

[29]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[30]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Common Neural Substrates for Response Selection across Modalities and Mapping Paradigms , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  S-R compatibility and response selection , 1995 .

[32]  D. Pandya,et al.  Projections to the frontal cortex from the posterior parietal region in the rhesus monkey , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  R. Andersen,et al.  Motor intention activity in the macaque's lateral intraparietal area. II. Changes of motor plan. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separating Processes within a Trial in Event-Related Functional MRI II. Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[35]  R. Passingham,et al.  Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  R. Andersen,et al.  Motor intention activity in the macaque's lateral intraparietal area. I. Dissociation of motor plan from sensory memory. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Ivan Toni,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[38]  M. Petrides Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  John D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Material-dependent and material-independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event-related fMRI investigation of response competition , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[41]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.