Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance

If humans are sensitive to the costs and benefits of favouring kin in different circumstances, a strong prediction is that cues of relatedness will have a positive effect on prosocial feelings, but a negative effect on sexual attraction. Indeed, positive effects of facial resemblance (a potential cue of kinship) have been demonstrated in prosocial contexts. Alternatively, such effects may be owing to a general preference for familiar stimuli. Here, I show that subtly manipulated images of other-sex faces were judged as more trustworthy by the participants they were made to resemble than by control participants. In contrast, the effects of resemblance on attractiveness were significantly lower. In the context of a long-term relationship, where both prosocial regard and sexual appeal are important criteria, facial resemblance had no effect. In the context of a short-term relationship, where sexual appeal is the dominant criterion, facial resemblance decreased attractiveness. The results provide evidence against explanations implicating a general preference for familiar-looking stimuli and suggest instead that facial resemblance is a kinship cue to which humans modulate responses in a context-sensitive manner.

[1]  G. Gallup,et al.  Reactions to children's faces: Resemblance affects males more than females , 2002 .

[2]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Paula M. Niedenthal,et al.  Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses , 1987 .

[4]  K. Grammer,et al.  Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design , 2001 .

[5]  P. R. Kunz,et al.  Assortative mating: a study of physiognomic homogamy. , 1973, Social biology.

[6]  D. Perrett,et al.  Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in humans: Partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair and eye colour , 2003 .

[7]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[8]  AH Bittles,et al.  Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics , 2001, Clinical genetics.

[9]  D I Perrett,et al.  Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The Attractiveness of Nonface Averages: Implications for an Evolutionary Explanation of the Attractiveness of Average Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  Thomas E. Myers,et al.  How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance , 2003 .

[13]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  A. Bittles,et al.  The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[15]  R. May When to be incestuous , 1979, Nature.

[16]  Lisa M. DeBruine,et al.  Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women , 2004 .

[17]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Facial Resemblance in Engaged and Married Couples , 1989 .

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[20]  D. Perrett,et al.  Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgements of attractiveness , 1999 .

[21]  L. DeBruine Facial resemblance enhances trust , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  L. DeBruine,et al.  Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same–sex faces more than other–sex faces , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[24]  G. Weisfeld,et al.  Sexual imprinting in human mate choice , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  GENERALIZATION OF MERE EXPOSURE EFFECTS TO AVERAGED COMPOSITE FACES , 2001 .

[27]  K. Nakayama,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article FITTING THE MIND TO THE WORLD: Face Adaptation and Attractiveness Aftereffects , 2022 .

[28]  R. Hussain,et al.  Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility? , 2002, Annals of human biology.

[29]  R. Ross Optimum orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparisons. , 1934 .

[30]  T. Bereczkei,et al.  Homogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence on mate choice preferences , 2002 .

[31]  B. Murphy,et al.  Adaptation to natural facial categories , 2022 .

[32]  V Blanz,et al.  On The Other Side of the Mean: The Perception of Dissimilarity in Human Faces , 2000, Perception.