The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change

Abstract The paper addresses the new competition for land arising from growing and changing demand for food when combined with increasing global demand for transport energy, under conditions of declining petro-chemical resources and the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The paper starts from the premise of a ‘food, energy and environment trilemma’ ( Tilman et al., 2009 ), where all demands to expand the area of cultivated land present high risks of increasing the carbon footprint of agriculture. Having reviewed the main drivers of demand for food and for liquid transport fuels, the paper weighs the controversies surrounding biofuels arising from food-price spikes, the demand for land, and consequent direct and indirect land-use change. It suggests that we need a more complex, and geographically differentiated, analysis of the interactions between direct and indirect land-use change. The paper then reviews evidence of land availability, and suggests that in addition to technical availability in terms of soil, water, and climate, political, social, and technological factors have significantly shaped the competition for land in different global regions, particularly the three major biofuel producing ones of the USA, Brazil and Europe. This point is further developed by reviewing the different innovation pathways for biofuels in these three regions. The main conclusion of this review is firstly that any analysis requires an integrated approach to the food-energy-environment trilemma, and secondly that strategic political direction of innovation and sustainability regulation are required to bring about major shifts in agriculture leading to sustainable intensification of cultivation ( Royal Society, 2009 ), rather than the continued expansion of cultivated area. The consequent perspective is one of considerable global variety in technologies, agricultural productive systems, and use of natural resources. This contrasts sharply with the world of a dominant global and integrated technology platform based on petro-chemicals to which we have become accustomed.

[1]  Mikael Höök,et al.  The Peak of the Oil Age : Analyzing the world oil production Reference Scenario in World Energy Outlook 2008 , 2010 .

[2]  Marc Londo,et al.  Developments in EU biofuels policy related to sustainability issues: overview and outlook , 2007 .

[3]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[4]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[5]  J. Goldemberg,et al.  The Sustainability of Ethanol Production from Sugarcane , 2008, Renewable Energy.

[6]  Marilyn Radler,et al.  Fourth-quarter earnings surged for US, Canadian firms , 2005 .

[7]  A. Chambers,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2008 , 2008 .

[8]  R. Perrin,et al.  Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science , 2009 .

[9]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping point , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  S. Robinson,et al.  Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People , 2010, Science.

[11]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Reaping the Benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture , 2009 .

[12]  Paul Leiby,et al.  Oil Price Shocks and the Macroeconomy: What Has Been Learned Since 1996 , 2004 .

[13]  H. Velthuizen,et al.  Agro-Ecological Zones Assessment , 2006 .

[14]  Christopher B Field,et al.  The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  O. Lucon,et al.  Ethanol learning curve—the Brazilian experience , 2004 .

[16]  B. Dale,et al.  Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Ben Brehmer,et al.  Assessing the current Brazilian sugarcane industry and directing developments for maximum fossil fuel mitigation for the international petrochemical market , 2009 .

[18]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[19]  I. Nhantumbo,et al.  Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Mozambique. , 2010 .

[20]  C. Bowyer,et al.  Anticipated indirect land use change associated with expanded use of biofuels and bioliquids in the EU: an analysis of the national renewable energy action plans. , 2010 .

[21]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Bioenergy - A Sustainable and Reliable Energy Source , 2010 .

[22]  J. Pretty Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  J. Mathews Biofuels : What a Biopact between North and South could achieve , 2007 .

[24]  J. G. van de Vooren,et al.  Sugarcane ethanol: contributions to climate change mitigation and the environment , 2008 .

[25]  Nils Brunsson,et al.  A World of Standards , 2000 .

[26]  T. Biersteker,et al.  The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance: Conclusions and directions , 2002 .

[27]  Glada Lahn,et al.  Sustainable Energy Security: Strategic Risks and Opportunities for Business , 2010 .

[28]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[29]  David B Lobell,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  J. Piesse,et al.  Three Bubbles and a Panic: An Explanatory Review of Recent Food Commodity Price Events , 2009 .

[31]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Globalization of the Amazon Soy and Beef Industries: Opportunities for Conservation , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  Lorenzo Cotula,et al.  Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. , 2009 .

[33]  José Vitor Bomtempo,et al.  The Performance of Brazilian Biofuels: An Economic, Environmental and Social Analysis , 2007 .

[34]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[35]  Alfred J. Cavallo,et al.  Hubbert's model : uses, meanings, and limits-2 , 2005 .

[36]  J. Neufeld,et al.  The State of Food and Agriculture , 1970 .

[37]  Sven Gärtner,et al.  Rain forest for biodiesel? : Ecological effects of using palm oil as a source of energy , 2007 .

[38]  Jack A. Heinemann,et al.  Agriculture at a Crossroads , 2008, Science.

[39]  J. Goldemberg Ethanol for a Sustainable Energy Future , 2007, Science.

[40]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2007 , 2007 .

[41]  M. Himmel,et al.  Welcome to Biotechnology for Biofuels , 2008, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[42]  F. Nelson,et al.  Biofuel, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania , 2009 .

[43]  Kenneth S. Deffeyes,et al.  Hubbert's Peak , 2001 .

[44]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol - an assessment of the possibilities of certified production , 2007 .

[45]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios , 2010 .

[46]  S. Wiggins,et al.  Rising food prices: a global crisis. , 2008 .

[47]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Peaking of world oil production: Impacts, mitigation, & risk management , 2005 .

[48]  Hao Tan,et al.  Biofuels and indirect land use change effects: the debate continues , 2009 .

[49]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Energy and Greenhouse Impacts of Biofuels , 2007 .

[50]  J. Goldemberg The Brazilian biofuels industry , 2008, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[51]  Edmar I. Teixeira,et al.  Land Use Dynamics and Sugarcane Production , 2008 .

[52]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Low Carbon Fuel Standards , 2009 .

[53]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2005 , 2005 .

[54]  Vagner A. Benedito,et al.  Crop Breeding for Low Input Agriculture: A Sustainable Response to Feed a Growing World Population , 2011 .

[55]  J. Porter,et al.  The Value of Producing Food, Energy, and Ecosystem Services within an Agro-Ecosystem , 2009, Ambio.