Micro-structural basis for particular vulnerability of the superolateral neck trabecular bone in the postmenopausal women with hip fractures.

In this study we analyzed the trabecular bone micro-architecture in the inferomedial and superolateral subregions of the femoral neck in a group with hip fractures and a control group of elderly women, with aim to clarify the micro-structural basis of bone fragility. Proximal femora from 29 Caucasian female cadavers were collected at Institute of Forensic Medicine in Belgrade (15 women with hip fracture: age 79.5±8.5 yrs.; and 14 women without hip fractures: age 74.1±9.3 yrs.). The femoral neck section was scanned in dry conditions using a micro-computed tomography (Scanco μCT 40), at 70 kV, 114 μA, 300 ms integration time, 36 μm resolution, isotropic, 1024×1024 pixels per slice, automatically evaluating trabecular micro-architecture using the built-in program of the micro-CT with direct 3D morphometry. The samples were foam padded to avoid any movement artifacts during scanning. Analysis of the neck section in the fracture group compared to the control cases demonstrated significantly lower bone volume fraction (mean: 6.3% vs. 11.2%, p=0.002), lower connectivity density (0.33/mm(3) vs. 0.74/mm(3), p=0.019) and higher trabecular separation (0.87 mm vs. 0.83 mm, p=0.030). Division into the superolateral and inferomedial regions of interest revealed that the superolateral neck displayed even more differences in micro-architectural properties between the fracture and non-fracture groups. Namely, while in the inferomedial neck only bone volume fraction and degree of anisotropy displayed significant inter-group variability (lower BV/TV with higher degree of anisotropy in the fracture group), in the superolateral neck almost all parameters were different between the fracture cases and the controls, where the fracture group showed a lower trabecular bone volume fraction (3.6% vs. 8.2%, p=0.001), lower connectivity (0.21 vs. 0.63/mm(3), p=0.008), more rod like trabecular structure (SMI: 2.94 vs. 2.62, p=0.049), higher separation and the thinned trabeculae (Tb.Sp: 0.89 vs. 0.85 mm, p=0.013; Tb.Th: 0.17 vs. 0.20 mm, p=0.05). In addition, after adjusting for the effects of BV/TV, the majority of differences disappeared, demonstrating that the bone loss manifests itself via the changes in micro-architectural parameters: trabecular thinning, rising the spacing between individual trabeculae, reducing trabecular connectivity and accentuating trabecular perforations leading to predominance of rod-like trabecular elements. Preferential impairment of the superolateral neck trabecular structure and organization in women with hip fracture reveals the region-dependent micro-structural basis of bone fragility in elderly women.

[1]  J C Netelenbos,et al.  An analysis of bone structure in patients with hip fracture. , 1987, Bone and mineral.

[2]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: Implications for osteoporotic fracture , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  J. Meakin,et al.  Compression or Tension? the Stress Distribution in the Proximal Femur , 2022 .

[4]  D. Rao,et al.  Is there a difference between right and left femoral bone density? , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[5]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Quantification of the Roles of Trabecular Microarchitecture and Trabecular Type in Determining the Elastic Modulus of Human Trabecular Bone , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  Y. Bunai,et al.  Age- and gender-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructure of cortical and trabecular bone at the human femoral neck , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  A. Boyde,et al.  DISORDERS OF BONE AND FRACTURE OF THE FEMORAL NECK Evaluation of Computer Image Analysis in Diagnosis , 1976, The Lancet.

[8]  C. Heiss,et al.  Right and left proximal femur analyses: Is there a need to do both? , 1996, Calcified Tissue International.

[9]  C L Benhamou,et al.  Side-to-side and within-side variability of 3D bone microarchitecture by conventional micro-computed tomography of paired iliac crest biopsies. , 2008, Bone.

[10]  P. Cripton,et al.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Variations in Three‐Dimensional Cancellous Bone Architecture of the Proximal Femur in Female Hip Fractures and in Controls , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  Michael Hahn,et al.  Decrease in the Osteocyte Lacunar Density Accompanied by Hypermineralized Lacunar Occlusion Reveals Failure and Delay of Remodeling in Aged Human Bone , 2022 .

[13]  N Loveridge,et al.  Structure of the Femoral Neck in Hip Fracture: Cortical Bone Loss in the Inferoanterior to Superoposterior Axis , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  J. Kanis,et al.  Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: I. Two-dimensional histology. , 2000, Bone.

[15]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Load distribution in the healthy and osteoporotic human proximal femur during a fall to the side. , 2008, Bone.

[16]  R. Evans,et al.  Lack of metabolic bone disease in patients with fracture of the femoral neck. , 1981, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Djuric,et al.  Inter-sex differences in structural properties of aging femora: implications on differential bone fragility: a cadaver study , 2011, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[18]  S. Cummings,et al.  BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long‐Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  S. Dane,et al.  Differences Between Right-and Left-Femoral Bone Mineral Densities in Right-and Left-Handed Men and Women , 2001, The International journal of neuroscience.

[20]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Site‐Specific Deterioration of Trabecular Bone Architecture in Men and Women With Advancing Age , 2008, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  C. Cooper,et al.  Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection , 1992, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  H Weinans,et al.  Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. , 2002, Bone.

[23]  B. Snyder,et al.  Assessment of the bilateral asymmetry of human femurs based on physical, densitometric, and structural rigidity characteristics. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  F Eckstein,et al.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads. , 2004, Bone.

[25]  A. LaCroix,et al.  Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density? , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Microarchitecture in focus , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[27]  F. V. Van Ginkel,et al.  Histomorphometric profile and vitamin D status in patients with femoral neck fracture. , 1982, Metabolic bone disease & related research.

[28]  M. Djuric,et al.  Region-Specific Sex-Dependent Pattern of Age-Related Changes of Proximal Femoral Cancellous Bone and Its Implications on Differential Bone Fragility , 2010, Calcified Tissue International.

[29]  N. Fazzalari,et al.  Structural and remodeling indices in the cancellous bone of the proximal femur across adulthood. , 2007, Bone.

[30]  T J Beck,et al.  Structural Trends in the Aging Femoral Neck and Proximal Shaft: Analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry Data , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  M. Djuric,et al.  Nanostructure and mineral composition of trabecular bone in the lateral femoral neck: implications for bone fragility in elderly women. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[32]  Harry K Genant,et al.  Bone mass and architecture determination: state of the art. , 2008, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[33]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Densitometric, morphometric and mechanical distributions in the human proximal femur. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  J A Kanis,et al.  Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: II. Three-dimensional histology. , 2000, Bone.

[35]  M. Peacock,et al.  The architecture of cancellous and cortical bone in femoral neck fracture. , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[36]  D. Chappard,et al.  Vertebral fractures are associated with increased cortical porosity in iliac crest bone biopsy of men with idiopathic osteoporosis. , 2009, Bone.

[37]  Y. Won,et al.  Age-and region-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructural properties of proximal femoral trabeculae , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[38]  É. Legrand,et al.  Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture, Bone Mineral Density, and Vertebral Fractures in Male Osteoporosis , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[39]  A Hofman,et al.  Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis , 1997, BMJ.

[40]  I. Vuori,et al.  Determinants of changes in bone mass and femoral neck structure, and physical performance after menopause: a 9-year follow-up of initially peri-menopausal women , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[41]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  Collagen fiber orientation in the femoral necks of apes and humans: do their histological structures reflect differences in locomotor loading? , 2002, Bone.

[42]  J. Heřt A new attempt at the interpretation of the functional architecture of the cancellous bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.