A Comparison of the Lactate Pro, Accusport, Analox GM7 and Kodak Ektachem Lactate Analysers in Normal, Hot and Humid Conditions

This study aimed to compare the performance of a new portable lactate analyser against other standard laboratory methods in three conditions, normal (20 +/- 1.3 degrees C; 40 +/- 5 % RH), hot (40 +/- 2.5 degrees C; 40 +/- 5 % RH), and humid (20 +/- 1.1 degrees C; 82 +/- 6 % RH) conditions. Seven healthy males, ([Mean +/- SE]: age, 26.3 +/- 1.3 yr; height, 177.7 +/- 1.6 cm; weight, 77.4 +/- 0.9 kg, .VO(2)max, 56.1 +/- 1.9 ml x kg x min(-1)) undertook a maximal cycle ergometry test to exhaustion in the three conditions. Blood was taken every 3 min at the end of each stage and was analysed using the Lactate Pro LT-1710, the Accusport, the Analox GM7 and the Kodak Ektachem systems. The MANOVA (Analyser Type x Condition x Workload) indicated no interaction effect (F(42,660), = 0.45, p > 0.99, Power = 0.53). The data across all workloads indicated that the machines measured significantly differently to each other (F(4,743) = 14.652, p < 0.0001, Power = 1.00). The data were moderately to highly correlated. We conclude that the Lactate Pro is a simple and effective measurement device for taking blood lactate in a field or laboratory setting. However, we would caution against using this machine to compare data from other machines.

[1]  A. Nevill,et al.  Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. , 1997, British journal of sports medicine.

[2]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[3]  B. Sjödin,et al.  Onset of Blood Lactate Accumulation and Marathon Running Performance , 1981, International journal of sports medicine.

[4]  G Atkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine , 1998, Sports medicine.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[7]  Garrett Fitzmaurice,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement. , 2002, Nutrition.

[8]  F Sardella,et al.  Blood lactate accumulation in top level swimmers following competition. , 1993, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[9]  B. Dawson,et al.  Measurement of Anaerobic Capacities in Humans , 1995, Sports medicine.

[10]  E. Coyle,et al.  Integration of the Physiological Factors Determining Endurance Performance Ability , 1995, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[11]  Pietro Enrico di Prampero,et al.  Energetics of muscular exercise , 1981 .

[12]  O Vaage,et al.  Anaerobic capacity determined by maximal accumulated O2 deficit. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  David T. Martin,et al.  Evaluation of the Lactate Pro blood lactate analyser , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[14]  P S Freedson,et al.  The Reliability of Lactate Measurements During Exercise , 1998, International journal of sports medicine.

[15]  Takayoshi Yoshida,et al.  Blood lactate parameters related to aerobic capacity and endurance performance , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.