Istanbul's earthquake hot spots: Geodetic constraints on strain accumulation along faults in the Marmara seismic gap

During the past century, a series of predominantly westward migrating M > 7 earthquakes broke an ~1000 km section of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF). The only major remaining “seismic gap” along the fault is under the Sea of Marmara (Main Marmara Fault (MMF)). We use 20 years of GPS observations to estimate strain accumulation on fault segments in the Marmara Sea seismic gap. We report the first direct observations of strain accumulation on the Princes' Islands segment of the MMF, constraining the slip deficit rate to 10–15 mm/yr. In contrast, the central segment of the MMF that was thought to be the most likely location for the anticipated gap-filling earthquakes shows no evidence of strain accumulation, suggesting that fault motion is accommodated by fault creep. We conclude that the Princes' Islands segment is most likely to generate the next M > 7 earthquake along the Sea of Marmara segment of the NAF.

[1]  Christian Beck,et al.  Submarine fault scarps in the Sea of Marmara pull‐apart (North Anatolian Fault): Implications for seismic hazard in Istanbul , 2005 .

[2]  Claude Rangin,et al.  The North Anatolian Fault in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey: Results of a Deep-towed Seismic and Multi-beam Bathymetric Survey , 2003 .

[3]  T. Herring,et al.  Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK , 2006 .

[4]  M. Cormier,et al.  Seafloor fault ruptures along the North Anatolia Fault in the Marmara Sea, Turkey: Link with the adjacent basin turbidite record , 2014 .

[5]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  The Seismicity in the Eastern Marmara Sea after the 17 August 1999 İzmit Earthquake , 2002 .

[6]  Mustafa Aktar,et al.  Microseismicity at the North Anatolian Fault in the Sea of Marmara offshore Istanbul, NW Turkey , 2009 .

[7]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  The active Main Marmara Fault , 2001 .

[8]  Haluk Ozener,et al.  Estimates of Seismic Potential in the Marmara Sea Region from Block Models of Secular Deformation Constrained by Global Positioning System Measurements , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas A. Herring,et al.  MATLAB Tools for viewing GPS velocities and time series , 2003 .

[10]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  Fault interactions in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart (North Anatolian Fault): earthquake clustering and propagating earthquake sequences , 2007 .

[11]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering , 1997 .

[12]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California , 1973 .

[13]  N. N. Ambraseys,et al.  The Seismic Activity of the Marmara Sea Region over the Last 2000 Years , 2002 .

[14]  M. N. Toksöz,et al.  Space-time migration of earthquakes along the North Anatolian fault zone and seismic gaps , 1979 .

[15]  K. Johnson,et al.  Strain accumulation across strike-slip faults: Investigation of the influence of laterally varying lithospheric properties , 2010 .

[16]  O. Lengliné,et al.  Evolution of the seismicity in the eastern Marmara Sea a decade before and after the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake , 2011 .

[17]  G. Dresen,et al.  An earthquake gap south of Istanbul , 2013, Nature Communications.

[18]  A. Şengör,et al.  The North Anatolian Fault , 2013 .

[19]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa‐Arabia‐Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions , 2005 .

[20]  A. Barka,et al.  Slip distribution along the North Anatolian fault associated with the large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967 , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[22]  O. Heidbach,et al.  Geomechanical model of the Marmara Sea region—I. 3-D contemporary kinematics , 2011 .

[23]  Onur Tan,et al.  The Earthquake Catalogues for Turkey , 2008 .

[24]  Claude Rangin,et al.  THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT: A NEW LOOK , 2005 .

[25]  Haluk Ozener,et al.  Seven years of postseismic deformation following the 1999, M = 7.4 and M = 7.2, Izmit-Düzce, Turkey earthquake sequence , 2009 .

[26]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[27]  Tom Parsons,et al.  Recalculated probability of M >= 7 earthquakes beneath the Sea of Marmara, Turkey , 2004 .